Posted on 03/12/2007 11:13:07 AM PDT by Princip. Conservative
Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.), a member of Congress since 1973, acknowledged his nontheism in response to an inquiry by the Secular Coalition for America. Rep. Stark is a senior member of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee and is Chair of the Health Subcommittee.
Our research reveals that Rep. Stark is the first open nontheist in the history of the Congress. He holds the highest level office of the four contest nominees who agreed to self-identify with our community.
(Excerpt) Read more at secular.org ...
To be totally honest, I couldn't care less if the Moonbats in the Bay Area elect an atheist. BTW, Pete Stark is the only member of congress I know of who has never lived in the district he represents. Oh well!
BTW what would a atheist swear the oath on, a copy of 'Origin of the Species'?
Perhaps other pagans in Congress will come forward now?
How about Barney Frank? Thoughts?
In California? For a RAT?
Pete Stark may be a liberal atheist, but when my company in Calabasas, CA was being hassled on our GSA Contract, he made a phone call and GSA was suddenly kissing up. He gets the job done, which is more than I can say for most other House members or Senators.
We should definitely make a stir about this, because it's unseemly in an overwhelmingly religious nation that a politician flagrantly be atheist, imho.
______________________________________________
I disagree. His religious beliefs, or lack thereof shouldn't matter...
Besides...this guy is a dem from San Francisco...there will be plenty of other "unseemly" attributes (starting with voting for tax hikes, for example) to capitalize on, I'm quite sure.
With a Californian it's more likely to be the Kama Sutra.
"Up to his constituents, and if they didn't know then, they do now.
BTW what would a atheist swear the oath on, a copy of 'Origin of the Species'?"
Yeah, that's what it would be. 'The fool hath said in his heart that there is no God.' Pete Stark is a fool.
But there are so many heretics and hypocrites in Congress that this is not a big deal.
"But there are so many heretics and hypocrites in Congress that this is not a big deal."
True, but it's concerning when they get so cavalier about it.
What do you suggest? A religious test to hold public office? Burn him at the stake?
The nerve of the guy - to have different religious beliefs than you!
"The nerve of the guy - to have different religious beliefs than you!"
Oh come on. I'm talking about making a stir to remind even the lefty people of California that they have a darn atheist as their Rep! Polls show that most Americans won't vote for an atheist candidate, right along with Muslims. Naturally, this is a district where it would be more likely. However, Republicans and conservatives would do well to remind voters that the atheists and the Muslims are, guess who? DEMOCRATS! Pete Stark would be hard-pressed to win in ANY district south of the Mason-Dixon line, for instance. We need to keep the voters informed.
I, for one, wouldn't vote for an atheist.
We knew he was a fool already. This is just further proof.
Would you vote for an atheist that had the same stance as you on every issue? If not, why?
"Would you vote for an atheist that had the same stance as you on every issue? If not, why?"
No, I don't think so. I just can't see for voting for someone who doesn't believe in God. If you don't believe in God, you just don't have the right perception or grasp on things. Evidently, most Americans agree with me, at least on the presidential level. The latest Gallup Poll on this finds that 53% of Americans wouldn't vote for an atheist for President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.