Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ROTB

There’s only one flaw in that interpretation...they start with the answer and work backwards to find the appropriate question to ask. They’ve defined the math to fit the idea that they were trying to describe much like the global warming alarmists do (ref: hockey stick). You can make the data fit the observations if you try hard enough and manipulate enough. You can’t conclude anything like this from a book as vague as the bible. Sorry but it just doesn’t work that way.


19 posted on 07/07/2007 5:27:11 AM PDT by AntiKev ("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: AntiKev

>There’s only one flaw in that interpretation...they start
>with the answer and work backwards to find the appropriate
>question to ask. They’ve defined the math to fit the idea
>that they were trying to describe much like the global
>warming alarmists do (ref: hockey stick). You can make the
>data fit the observations if you try hard enough and
>manipulate enough. You can’t conclude anything like this
>from a book as vague as the bible. Sorry but it just doesn’t
>work that way.

The math for all three prophecies works without violence being done to the language of the Bible.

Please support your assertion by naming exactly where the writer of the article, “defined the math to fit the idea that they were trying to describe”.


26 posted on 07/07/2007 9:35:16 AM PDT by ROTB (Our Constitution...only for a [Christian] people...it is wholly inadequate for any other.-J.Q.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson