Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hemorrhage

You don’t need to be a mind reader, go do some research on executive order 13039. I can tell by your responses how limited your knowledge is on this topic.

How do you know who the TWA 800 terrorists were? Are you saying it was Bin Laden behind it? The White House at the time, according to Richard Clarke, thought Iran might have been behind it. Besides that, the FBI didn’t even get CIA Files on Bin Laden until 1995!


89 posted on 07/18/2007 6:41:53 PM PDT by WonkyTonky (My gun is safer than Ted Kennedy's car. Vote for Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: WonkyTonky

>> I can tell by your responses how limited your knowledge is on this topic.

Cute. Dismissive ... but cute. My knowledge of this topic is fine ... and I certainly know enough to know I can simply roll my eyes, and move on to more important matters. I just don’t feel it necessary to glorify ridiculous conspiracy theories with intellectual debate (again, much like the “9-11 Truth” junk). Conspiracy theories - by their nature - cannot be disproven to the satisfaction of their purveyors ... so why bother?

My concern is less for the content of this conversation(which reminds me of a Bilderberg/ CFR debate ... David Icke anyone?) than for the resulting image it gives everyday Americans (at least the ones that don’t believe the former President of the United States would sell out the deaths of hundreds of American citizens and protect known terrorists so he wouldn’t “upset the apple cart”) of the dominant thought in one of the online bastions of the conservative movement.

The image this gives of conservatism is every bit as unflattering as the image of Amy Goodman and her fellow liberal “9-11 Truth” whackjobs.

I believe Bill Clinton is a narcissist, often wrong, morally questionable, a frequent liar, a purjeror, an obstructor of justice, a terrible husband, a lousy father, and a substandard President (somewhere between Carter (worst) and Nixon in ranking late 20th century U.S. Presidents).

I believe he was a poll-watcher, not an ideologue - more concerned about his popularity than his policies (hence, welfare reform and Dick Morris). But, I also believe he’d be a good guy to have a cigar (to smoke) and watch a ballgame with - his good-ol-boy thing, and bawdy sense of humor might be worth listing to. I DO NOT believe he is a traitor to his country, a terrorist sympathizer, a murderer, or that he would risk his popularity to cover up the deaths by terrorism of hundreds of American civilians (for no logical reason whatsoever).

H


91 posted on 07/19/2007 10:46:13 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson