[upsdriver]

Another great article showing once again that Duncan Hunter isn’t tayloring his positions for an election, but has lived them for the last 27 years. Why are so many conservatives so blind to that fact?

[Calpernia]

Maybe it is because they aren’t conservatives, referencing my post 17 from that thread last night.

[Sun]

“Another great article showing once again that Duncan Hunter isn’t tayloring his positions for an election, but has lived them for the last 27 years.”

No flip flops with Hunter. He is so sincere on every issue, and has CONSISTENTLY walked the walk for the last 27 years that he served.

Duncan Hunter is the presidential candidate worth fighting for!

[cripplecreek]

Why are so many conservatives so blind to that fact?

Because they're party lapdogs first and conservatives when it's convenient.

I recently read a story that suggested that the GOP is unhappy with Virgil Goode for supporting Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo and (shudder) Ron Paul. Basically they're angry because he isn't supporting one of their approved RINOs.

[mjaneangels@aolcom]

“Another great article showing once again that Duncan Hunter isn’t tayloring his positions for an election, but has lived them for the last 27 years. Why are so many conservatives so blind to that fact?”

You make a good comment and ask a good question. I support Duncan Hunter because he has been consistantly saying and doing the same things for years, and I agree with him.

As far as I am concerned, voting for someone I disagree with, when I can vote for someone I agree with makes no sense. Electiblilty is based on whether the voters agree with the candidate, not based on a sales job.

I am voting for Hunter, and as soon as I can make a little overtime, I will restart sending some money his way.