[Old_Mil]

very little name recognition, and a Congressman hasnt been ELECTED president in 100+ years. You gotta remember, FR is not representative of the nation as a whole. Duncan should have served in senate or governor first. Or serve as somebodys VP and then run.

Frankly, I think that about 90% of the electorate could care less about this. They're interested in ideas, and a vision as to the sort of America that the president wants. Is it a tax and spend, big government, gay friendly country that outsources its jobs and coddles Mohammedans? Or is it a frugal, limited government, traditional values nation that looks out for American citizens first and foremost? Given the option, I daresay the vast number of Americans would pick the second option.

Running Duncan Hunter against Hillary Clinton gives the electorate that choice. Nominating Frudy McRomney gives the electorate a choice between two politicians who share the first vision to varying degrees.

So why is the RNC so eager to make sure that we aren't given a choice?

[cripplecreek]

Running Duncan Hunter against Hillary Clinton gives the electorate that choice.

Exactly and the lack of anchorage on the right is why I blame the GOP for the behavior of the democrats.

[upsdriver]

>>>Running Duncan Hunter against Hillary Clinton gives the electorate that choice. Nominating Frudy McRomney gives the electorate a choice between two politicians who share the first vision to varying degrees.<<<

Duncan Hunter will inspire the electorate to turn out to vote.

Hillary will be the major inspiration to turn out the vote if Frudy McRomney is nominated.