I think border security and Hunter’s ideas on China and manufacturing jobs will resonate with American’s across the board far better than a few seasons on Law and Order.
The Democrats think health care is going to be a big issue to get the vote out, they are wrong. When a worker who has lost his job in the rust belt hears a Hunter message, there’s a good chance that’s a vote for Hunter.
When those living in cities and towns being overrun by illegals begin to understand he has twice the credibility on the issue as any of the rest, another vote for Hunter.
Who do we want making the case before the American people that victory is the only option in Iraq? Fred, Rudy, Hitlery or Obama.....or do we want a man that knows the military very well, served himself, putting his life on the line, whose son has served two tours in that very war?
So, don’t sell Hunter short, there is no doubt he is the best and the American voters just might figure that out in the interim.
You’re absolutely right Wildcatclan...Hunter would run away with the general election. He’s the only Republican who has the capacity to rebuild the Reagan coalition. The problem is that the Rockafeller wing of the Reagan coalition has gone beyond the pale with their globalism, and they are no longer willing to have Reaganites dictating policy as it would interfere with their endgame. Hence the problem.
So why do we need a 'Values Voters' debate to determine that? Fred Thompson has stated his positions on illegal immigration. All you have to do is read his essays and listen to his radio commentaries. Same for abortion and homosexual 'marriage'. He has made his views known. Why should he have to perform for some self appointed leaders in order to re-state them, just so that he can get their 'blessing'. That's no different from the liberal media folks, except for the tenor of the questions.