[Rudder]

After reading your post 77, it would seem accurate to say you can’t support anyone for POTUS.

[RachelFaith]

Then it would seem you have a deficient reading or comprehension issue, as I said no such thing. Please do not put words or concepts to my positions. I state them clearly enough to do without addition or subtraction.

Now can you speak to the issues presented or do you simply support the idea that the states should constitutionally define the personhood of the unborn as property?

[familyop]

Rudder wrote:
"After reading your post 77, it would seem accurate to say you can’t support anyone for POTUS."

Duncan Hunter--a write-in, if necessary. ...and maybe nonpolitical politics, if necessary (see Vaclav Havel, and how he defeated communism in Czechoslovakia) .