Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stainlessbanner
Paul noted that every nation in Europe got rid of slavery without civil wars; kind of hard to argue with.

But the civil war was also about an issue just as big which was not avoidable, and that was the question of whether the US was going to be able to industrialize (which required tarrifs) or whether we were going to allow England to dump manufactured goods here and essentially continue using us as a colony.

16 posted on 12/26/2007 9:53:53 PM PST by damondonion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: damondonion
Interesting argument, and the first time I've seen that argument anywhere. It has merit, though.

You'd have to show by research, I think, that the Republicans had a coherent industrial policy in mind, one, and that, secondly, they made medicine to precipitate a constitutional crisis -- and win it politically or militarily -- which would allow them to recast the federal Union in such a way as to empower the federal government to impose that policy over the objections of the Southern States.

Which is what happened, so it isn't hard to argue that some farsighted Republican(s) might have entertained a long view even before the war, that anticipated much of what followed.

Which, if shown, would damn them as war criminals.

49 posted on 01/07/2008 5:14:05 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson