Here's a Stanley (Kowalski):
Posted on 06/19/2008 10:08:18 AM PDT by coffee260
Here's a Stanley (Kowalski):
Doh....thanks for the correction..... my fault!
Mea culpa mea culpa....
Gee is Thursday CRANKY DAY here?
Usually the place is quite civil - cheer up people.
I don’t know what is junk science about it.
I still recognize the three basic racial classifications.
It is the same as the three primary colors, reb, blue, and yellow.
Obviously, there are sub racial groups, as well as mixed races.
I will admit that racial classification gets harder every year with mixing, but there are still obvious distinctions between the 3 primary groups.
And yes, when did “African” become a race????
No amount of electoral votes will make it legal for a non citizen to be president of the United States. This is not a witch hunt. It’s an Official Document hunt. That’s all. If Obama’s people had not produced this apparent fraud the question would die.
(See the post where the Freeper showed us an official Cerificate, officially stamped).
http://www.valeehill.net/genealogy/showmedia.php?mediaID=169
Unless it has an embossed seal signed by the registrar, it is worthless. Even a copy should be signed and sealed.
Apparently the state of Hawaii requires an embossed seal as opposed to a stamped seal.
Notice the borders are different.
The idea of the "caucasian" ie Aryan (Indo-Aryan) race comes from the (since disproven) belief that all Europeans are from the caucauses mountain region (present day Armenia and Georgia). That is why when some idiot calls me a "caucasian" I always say "do I look like a (expletive) Armenian to you?"
Under the old discredited system, all East Indians were referred to as "caucasoids", although genetics have shown this to be far from the truth.
(It's not OHB).
BTW, Mondo, here is something to cover. A graphics expert has taken the Kos/Obama birth certification to the woodshed.
THANK YOU! And much thanks to the family of Patricia DeCosta for allowing us all to have a look at an actual document.
Right off top without further looking
1. has Dept. of Public Health Seal
2. has facsimile stamped signature
3. has different border than on Obama’s “document”
the plot thickens
The real one - Patricia DeCosta - reads
“Date accepted by state registrar”
the Obama one reads
“Date filed by registrar”
?
he’s wrong about the seal and wrong about the overlapping border art. A Freeper said they looked at a copy of one from a year ago and the border DO overlap.
He’s wrong about the seal and wrong about the overlapping border art. A Freeper posted they looked at a copy of a birth certifcate they had from a year ago and the border art DOES overlap.
If you blow up the border corner on the DeCosta doc, it does overplap.
But I posted several times here how I contacted the dept and they said the signature stamp was on the back and the seal was embossed DEEPLY and visible from the front. On the DeCosta doc you can see it. On the Obama doc, IT SHOULD BE VISIBLE TOO!!!
Except it only overlaps on the Kos document. Someone fixed it on the Obama site version. Compare the lower corners of the border intersection for this:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616
and
http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
I pointed this out last week, but was summarily ignored. Save both to your PC then zoom in the lower corners. they are separately produced documents. Surprised?
So maybe it’s the degree of overlap, because on the real DeCosta doc, they do overlap slightly.
Overlap may or may not be the norm, but the FACT that there is NO OVERLAP on the version from Obama’s site tells us these were either created separately or printed separately. Either way, it is not two photocopies of the same document that was theoretically printed up from the State of Hawaii’s computer. In fact, the entire thing was forged, based on the other 10 points of the analysis.
Santan’s spawn, aka the black messiah needs...NO STINKIN birth certificate!
.Even if the document is real, it doesnt matter because OBAMA AND MICHELLE ARE FAKE.
Holy loophole, Batman! I thought someone born to one US citizen parent overseas was automatically a natural-born US citizen. Looks that the requirement is *two* US citizen parents. That’s just hard to fathom - that two illegal aliens on US soil can produce a natural-born US citizen baby, but one natural-born US citizen on foreign soil can’t produce a natural-born US citizen baby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.