Posted on 06/19/2008 6:33:29 PM PDT by the anti-liberal
This is just confirmation of what we already knew. Sometimes a reminder is helpful.
When he says 'enforcement first,' remind him that he's tried this before - there's a difference between 'immigration reform' and 'comprehensive immigration reform.' The former is needed (though it wouldn't be if our current laws were actually enforced, but you know how it goes), the later is shamnesty.
ping
BTT!
Thanks, chicagolady.
Being as many people don't click on links, here is a link to your Post Yesterday about this here at FR.
Also, there is an article by AP (who FR is boycotting) which quotes you.
AP charges by the word if we use their words here, maybe you can charge them for using yours?
Here is what they said:
"He's having his private meetings to rally Hispanics and to tell them what they want to hear," she said. "I'm outraged that he would reach out to me as a Hispanic but not as a conservative."I don't think it is out of line to post your words here from an AP article, even if they paid you for them
So true.
McCain really hasn’t flipped on this issue.
In order to get the vote, he was limited in stating that our rejection of Senate Bill 2611 was due to our wanting the border secured first. He said that he heard us loud and clear. Border Security first.
What McCain has, or is pretending to have, is selective hearing. Apparently he never heard us say border security first and NO AMNESTY. I’m learning that much of what is important is what is NOT said. Assuming nothing. Read between the lines. These folks must have advisors that lay awake nights coming up with ways to fool anyone not paying close attention.
In fact, if statements by the other R candidates are reviewed, much of the same regarding this issue can be found, and frankly, we’d probably be in the same boat on this issue with any of them. ONLY Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo were SPECIFIC about attrition through enforcement and NO amnesty of any kind in conjunction with an effectively secured border.
Which is precisely why the MSM ignored them (and Fred) - they were scared!
The MSM, imo, is exercising too much influence in deciding this election. They are the only reason we're stuck with such awful candidates.
As an ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION FREEREPUBLIC PING PERSON I have been asked to come on .......
CNN AMERICAN MORNING, This coming Monday morning and talk about Juan Mc Cain HISPANDERING at the Drake hotel in Chicago at the “Hispanic Voices reception”
They cannot tell me what time the interview will be until Sunday!!
Wanted to alert you to the post about CNN
Cool!
Thanks for the heads up!
Congratulations!!! Keep us updated.
Great!
Don't blame the MSM alone.
The republican party apparatus determined who "we" would run for president.
Serious candidates need not apply.
(But don't stop writing those letters)
“If I am elected President I assure you that in 2009 I will ask Congress to pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform... It is a Federal Responsibility”
It’s a Federal Responsibility to secure our borders you Traitorous ^%^%#$ *&*& ;lii7^&**&^$%!!!...
This is the link for Hispanic’s against illegal immigration — ‘you don’t speak for me,’
http://dontspeakforme.org/ourstory.html
STE=Q
:^D
Thanks for the link!
Michelle Malkin is a source who can’t be doubted. I feel sick. That lying, backstabbing, treacherous McCain.
Good luck chicagolady, you’ve done us all proud!
Thanks to all for the good wishes, I am gonna do my homework so I get the facts straight and get my points across!!
Let us know if there is anything we can help you with. I’m CNN deprived. I shut down the cable last year to finish my book and now I can’t convince myself that I want it again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.