Whatever the merits, there is a body of news reports and investigative effort that suggests that there is no support for the proposition that he was born in Honolulu and at least a reasonable inference he was born in Kenya.
And the current look at the issue is addressed to a course of events that might have resulted in the actors being placed in that position.
The reason I wanted to address your post is the comment on the marriage--if they were married, I am reasonably confident that it stands up and Obama is not illegitimate and doesn't get under Sec. 1409, even if 1409 is in fact applicable. And I also take the marriage as a given because of the record of the divorce although I have not yet found the file--recitation of the content of the pleadings is accurate as far as the grounds are concerned and leads you to think the pleading exists. And gives us an excuse to look for what counsel said about where the marriage was contracted in the first place.
FWIW, I don't think WOSG's tone is excessive. He (she?) is a passionate man, defending a passionately held belief.
It's not the language or tone I would take, but it is well within what I would regard as the limits of political discourse.