[Calpernia]

Does this mean that Maureen Dowd’s article was true?

[Amityschild]

Damn...missed that one. Link?

[Fred Nerks]

“Does this mean that Maureen Dowd’s article was true?

Nothing but denials on the web:

http://www.therewillbetruth.com/?p=64

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/donations.asp

[Fred Nerks]

“Does this mean that Maureen Dowd’s article was true?”

I’m still looking:

http://albanymediabias.blogspot.com/2008/07/your-daily-obama_17.html

“That the Dowd column is a fake is without dispute. But who created this fake column attacking the Obama campaign? We suspect that the Obama itself is responsible for the fake column, planting it to appear as a post of a far-right blogger, in order to discredit the underlying allegations as nothing more than a GOP, right-wing conspiracy...

Moreover, the appearance of the fake Maureen Dowd story rapidly materialized on the Obama website long before “it had feet” appearing on multiple web sites and blogs throughout the nation. How did an Obama campaign worker criticize the Moore posting and thereafter the Obama campaign post a response on its “Fight the Smears” website long before the spoof was circulated throughout the blogosphere...”