Lies, lies, lies.
11/05/2009
Remember this?
Dear Dr. Fukino,
I request an electronic copy of the proof offered to establish/verify ‘Date of Birth’ as required, for an amendment to be made to President Obama’s birth certificate. Please send the proof as offered or as filed if it was abstracted. If these records are already public, please give me directions on where to find them.
Thank you,
(Name WIthheld)
———-
Date: 2009/10/8
To: (Name WIthheld), “Fukino, Chiyome L.” <chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov>
This request was already received a response.
Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Phone: (808) 586-4442
Fax: (808) 586-4444
email: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov
NOTICE TO REQUESTER
(Use multiple forms if necessary)
TO: Jeff Goldman
FROM: Janice Okubo, Department of Health (808) 586-4442
(Agency/name & telephone number of contact person at agency)
DATE REQUEST RECEIVED: 10/8/09
DATE OF THIS NOTICE: 10/29/09
GOVERNMENT RECORDS YOU REQUESTED (attach copy of request or provide brief description below):
1. Request is attached
2.
3.4.
Notice is provided to you that your request:
☐ Will be granted in its entirety.
☐ Cannot be granted because☐ Agency does not maintain the records. Agency believed to maintain records:
☐ Agency needs a further description or clarification of the records requested. Please contact the agency
and provide the following information:
☐ Request requires agency to create a summary or compilation from records not readily retrievable.
☒ Is denied in its entirety ☐ Will be granted only as to certain parts
based upon the following exemption provided in HRS § 92F-13 and/or § 92F-22 and other laws cited below (portions of records that agency will not disclose should be described in general terms).
RECORDS OR APPLICABLE AGENCY
INFORMATION WITHHELD STATUTES JUSTIFICATION
Vital Records HRS §338-18(b) Access to records is
§92F-13 (4) (Supp.1989) restricted by statute
REQUESTER’S RESPONSIBILITIES:
You are required to (1) pay any lawful fees assessed; (2) make any necessary arrangements with the agency to inspect, copy or receive copies as instructed below; and (3) provide the agency any additional information requested. If you do not comply with the requirements set forth in this notice within 20 business days after the postmark date of this notice or the date the agency makes the records available, you will be presumed to have abandoned your request and the agency shall have no further duty to process your request. Once the agency begins to process your request, you may be liable for any fees incurred. If you wish to cancel or modify your request, you must advise the agency upon receipt of this notice.
METHOD & TIMING OF DISCLOSURE:
Records available for public access in their entireties must be disclosed within a reasonable time, not to exceed 10 business days, or after receipt of any prepayment required. Records not available in their entireties must be disclosed within 5 business days of this notice or after receipt of any prepayment required. If incremental disclosure is authorized by HAR § 2-71-15, the first increment must be disclosed within 5 business days of this notice or after receipt of any prepayment required.
Method of Disclosure:
☐ Inspection at the following location: .
☐ Copy will be provided in the following manner:
☐ Available for pick-up at the following location: .
☐ Will be mailed to you.
☐ Will be transmitted to you by other means requested: .
Timing of Disclosure: All records, or first increment where applicable, will be made available or provided to you:
☐ On .
☐ After prepayment of fees and costs of $ (50% of fees +100% of costs, as estimated below).
Payment may be made by: ☐ cash ☐ personal check ☐ other .
For incremental disclosures, each subsequent increment will be disclosed within 20 business days after:
☐ The prior increment (if one prepayment of fees is required and received).
☐ Receipt of each incremental prepayment required.
Disclosure is being made in increments because the records are voluminous and the following extenuating circumstances exist:
☐ Agency must consult with another person to determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure under HRS chapter 92F.
☐ Request requires extensive agency efforts to search, review, or segregate the records or otherwise prepare the records for inspection or copying.
☐ Agency requires additional time to respond to the request in order to avoid an unreasonable interference with its other statutory duties and functions.
☐ A natural disaster or other situation beyond agency’s control prevents agency from responding to the request within 10 business days.
ESTIMATED FEES & COSTS:
The agency is authorized to charge you certain fees and costs to process your request (even if no record is subsequently found to exist), but must waive the first $30 in fees assessed for general requesters and the first $60 in fees when the agency finds that the request made is in the public interest. See HAR §§ 2-71-19, -31 and -32. The agency may require prepayment of 50% of the total estimated fees and 100% of the total estimated costs prior to processing your request. The following is the estimate of the fees and costs that the agency will charge you, with the applicable waiver amount deducted:Fees: Search Estimate of time to be spent: $
($2.50 for each 15-minute period)
Review & segregation Estimate of time to be spent: $
($5.00 for each 15-minute period)
Fees waived ☐ general ($30) ☐ public interest ($60) <$ >
Other $
(Pursuant to HAR § 2-7-31(B) )
Total Estimated Fees: $
Costs: Copying Estimate of # of pages to be copied: $
(@ $ per page.)
Other $
Total Estimated Costs: $
For questions about this notice, please contact the person named above. Questions regarding compliance with the UIPA may be directed to the Office of Information Practices at 808-586-1400 oroip@hawaii.gov.
Therefore, Obama changed his ‘Date of Birth.’ Why?
Sexist, Racist, War-Loving Obots Exposed
10/22/2009
I thought I would share with you guys my latest award. I gladly accept it with pride and would like to make a speech!
This brilliant Obot has decided to take their racism and sexism out in the open. It decided to create a contest aimed at making ‘women’ birthers seem crazy. Big surprise, huh?
We have all seen these sexist attacks carried out against, Hillary Clinton, Cynthia McKinney and Sarah Palin, by the Oboto Brigade, but now it’s my turn and I’d like to revel in exposing them.
First, let’s take a look at the prize for their little contest: ‘Batshirt Award’ (BTW, I am supposed to be upset I won–shhh…don’t tell them I love this opportunity to expose the sexism)
Notice the obvious female figure they decided to present? This is no ‘accident,’ it’s that all familiar desperate derangement that Obots get when a woman challenges their tiny brains. And it’s the same date-rapist mentality that too many rabid Obots seem to have developed in the last two years.
This sexist, racist Obot blogger also opened the nominations for the next ‘birther’ to win this awesome and oh-so-clever prize: “Announcing: And so now I am opening nominations for the next Batshirt award. Please comment following on the craziest Batshirt birther antics for next week’s award.”
To which, the first sexist obot replies–falling into the trap: “I would like to nominate: Orly Taitz’s frivolous appeal to the sanctions she received for filing a frivolous lawsuit in Rhodes v. MacDonald.”
The sexist Obot that owns the blog also adds this about me: “I don’t know where she got the idea that Stanley Ann Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis were cousins (at least no closer than Barack Obama and Dick Cheney), but she must think that all people of color look alike from her photo collection of Barack Obama and Hawaiian royalty.”
Now this does sicken me on many levels. But it should be exposed. All their classless, tacky, discrimination meant to oppress minorities and women should be exposed. This sexist racist Obot has done some sleight of hand here. Not only does it dare ‘feign offense on behalf of minorities’ cloaking itself in inflammatory and phony cries of racism, but it completely ignored the photos I presented of Charles Reed Bishop, Madelyn Payne Dunham and Stanley Ann Dunham. (unless, of course, this Obot believes these three individuals are “people of color.”)
Which reminds me, why can’t this Obot be bothered to politely call Native Hawaiians by their real identities? Obama has presented a COLB that says he is African American. Why not call him that? Why did they lump these people into one empty label? I suspect racism is behind that.
But more importantly, I am a progressive liberal and I find it highly offensive and hypocritical that an Obot would dare speak on my behalf and pretend to know who I am when IT voted for a man who lied about ending the wars in the Middle East, so that he could win an election. He lied to beat three women that were brave enough to compete. He cheated on this fact alone.
The open hate towards women, the way they USE minorities to suit their purposes–it’s out of control. Obots use people that they target as vulnerable and ‘incapable of having a voice’ and they ’speak for them.’ They use them as human shields to deflect criticism and don’t seem to consider the consequences, anyone’s feelings or the overall health of the nation.
People are growing so tired of this divisive Obama BULLSHIT. Seriously.
I found common ground with people on the right and that’s more peace than these Obots will ever know. They are busy isolating themselves from half the country trying to marginalize others. It won’t work in the end–they will be marginalized. No one will follow their plastic Jesus to the end.
Anyway, this Obot made no attempt to ask me why I am investigating–they just decided it was racist. They decided that exploiting the pain of minorities and their very REAL experience with racism and hate was the better course of action than simply asking me: “why the photos?” or “why investigate this?”
I didn’t mind pointing that out to one SEXIST OBOT:
ME: “BTW, you obots need to stop ’speaking for minorities’ and pretending to ‘take offense’ for them. Talk about racist and belittling.”
But, what I am left with are the same questions I have had since the primaries: Obots know that Obama lied (was lying) to them about ending the wars in the Middle East to get elected why did they let Obama exploit the victims of those wars and why do they still let him exploit them? It’s better I share my views on the Obot-haters with you guys so you know up front, I will confront low and disgusting sexist, racist attacks. And I shared it with them of course, too:
“What’s so amazing is that you racist pigs obviously actually voted for the racist pig in office. You voted for a man who exploited at least a million dead Middle Eastern babies, children, mothers and fathers so that he could win the primary and the general election. YOU are the neocons now.
Right now, you could devote a website to holding Obama’s feet to the flames on his promises to end the genocidal wars in the Middle East. But, instead, you hate Muslims and Middle Easterners so much, you would rather protect the murderer in the White House from scrutiny than speak on their behalf. It’s actually sick and tragic. You USED these poor people.
Well, I will speak on their behalf. Tell your murderous, monstrous President to get the h*ll out of their countries. Tell him you are SICK AND TIRED of the exploitation and this isn’t what you voted for.
But you won’t because you love fat, greedy democrats more than any sweet middle eastern child maimed or killed in YOUR genocidal war. This blood is on YOUR hands. It’s not on my hands–try as you might to twist my effort to stop these wars into another chance to exploit and race-bait.
You sickos wrap yourselves in race-baiting and exploit the men and women enslaved in this country all for grotesque political favor. You exploit those who have suffered from racism and hate crimes so that your ‘guy’ does better in the polls.
I, however, did not vote for the Monster George W. Bush nor Barack H. Obama. I am a progressive, liberal, feminist and I protested these sick wars. I continue to protest the illegal wars.
I stand against violence, against discrimination and against those illegal, genocidal wars.
You, on the other hand, can’t even be bothered to speak out against the wars your president claimed he would end. Instead you exploit the dead SOME MORE most likely because you have no respect for those who don’t look like you or worship like you.
As an atheist, I honor everyone’s right to choose their own religion.
It’s true, I have held up a photo or three of myself to my little one at home always bragging how much he looks like me. Now that I realize that’s racist–I will be more considerate.
But in your rush to race-bait and look like a total hypocritical jerk, you forgot to mention what I am really looking at:
E. Bernice Bishop Dunham’s name in this will:
http://www.ksbe.edu/pauahi/will.php
AND Obama’s own two statements talking about a POSSIBLE connection in ‘Dreams’ and here:
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2007/Feb/10/ln/FP702100346.html
“Tourists at the beach would sometimes assume Obama was Hawaiian, and his grandfather “would come up beside them and whisper, with appropriate reverence, that I was the great-grandson of King Kamehameha,” Obama recalled.”
That’s all. I don’t care how you twist it to exploit others. You better have all your facts straight and your backyard better be SPOTLESS. It’s not. You support war, I look at photos. I can tell you WHICH is WORSE.
If your Monster-in-Chief were transparent at all and wasn’t such a filthy liar, I wouldn’t have to investigate his story. I hung on to Al Gore until 2004, John Kerry and Ohio until 2006. I will NOT BE BULLIED into letting go of this.
Thanks for showing what an ugly and exploitative racist you are. The world will do well when someone stops the racist in the White House and his Racist, exploitative MINIONS.”
I have to admit, this is really how I feel and I am glad to call these pigs on their hypocrisy. I know there are plenty of conservatives that didn’t intend to vote for these wars when they first cast their votes in 2000 and I know there are many variables that contributed to the conservative votes in 2004–I don’t pretend to understand nor do I judge anyone on that. I voted for the spineless John Kerry for crying out loud.=) I know that most conservatives have questions and concerns about these wars. Understand, this is all new to the Obots. They don’t get that they are being used.
I am not here to argue about the war–I am just to stating what most of my readers already know or suspect about me–I am a liberal through and through. But, I am not a democrat–I have more pride than that.
How dare they stand and judge anyone as racist? I hope you will all call them out for their sexism and their racism every chance you get.
[UPDATE: I don't have a problem telling people where I come from on women's issues. I have freely discussed the matter that when I was fifteen; I was kidnapped, raped and the perpetrator tried to hang me from a tree. Not that long ago, my teenage daughter and her friend found themselves in a situation where five thugs sexually assaulted them in an abandoned apartment.
I am very in tune with behavior meant to degrade women. I will fight back with exactly the same treatment. It's been my experience that unless a chauvinist pig knows how it feels to be taken down in a degrading and humiliating way--they simply ignore the plight of girls, women and young boys in this country and globally. They turn their smug elitist noses up because they have no idea what it feels like to be oppressed. It's pathetic that Obots choose to ignore the pain women have had to endure since the beginning of time.
Obots are the first to degrade women in the context of a political discussion. They ridicule, belittle and humiliate with their sexism and hate. They don't want women to have voices. If I didn't speak--THEN they would win.
If I didn't speak out and against them, they would put words in my mouth and distort my positions to further their political causes at my expense and at the expense of all women. They are ruthless pigs.
I don't know what Obots want me to do with this anger, but if they aren't pleased with being called out publicly--then they need to simply stop the offensive behavior and refuse to take part. For their daughters', sisters' and mothers' sakes--they need to stop.]
Aloha! (Open Thread)
10/22/2009
Here’s an open thread for those who love the great nation of Hawaii…=)
Penn.
10/21/2009
Pardon the language in the video. I am posting this because I really connect with Penn.
Waaaaa! Was Obama a baby on August 4, 1961?
10/08/2009
“A grownup is a child with layers on.”
– Woody Harrelson
Assignment for those interested in finding the truth.
Today I sent three UIPA requests to Hawaii. The DoH responded that no records exist to two of my requests, but a third request yielded an unusual response. I am posting it for you so that you may ask Ms. Okubo the same question or a clever variant of this question. Ms. Okubo’s answer in context of all my UIPA requests seems to indicate I can’t have the records because they are covered by state law–which means they exist. Please have a look and get to writing UIPA requests to verify this finding:
“From: [My Email Address]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:20 AM
To: Fukino, Chiyome L.; Okubo, Janice S.
Subject: And another UIPA requestDear Dr. Fukino,
Under the Uniform Information Practices Act of the State of Hawaii, “…the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power. Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy. Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public’s interest. Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy—the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies—shall be conducted as openly as possible’
I request an electronic copy of the proof offered to establish/verify ‘Date of Birth’ as required, for an amendment to be made to President Obama’s birth certificate. Please send the proof as offered or as filed if it was abstracted. If these records are already public, please give me directions on where to find them.
This request is a Hawaii UIPA (Uniform Information Practices Act) request under section 92F-12.
Thank you,
T.”
Ms. Okubo’s response to this:
“From: Okubo, Janice S. <janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov>
Date: 2009/10/8
Subject: RE: And another UIPA request
To: [My Email Address] “Fukino, Chiyome L.” <chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov>This request was already received a response.
Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Phone: (808) 586-4442
Fax: (808) 586-4444
email: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov”
Ruling out the possibilities:
These are the other two I sent and her response:
“I request an electronic copy of the proof offered to establish/verify ‘Birth Place,’ as required, for an amendment to be made to President Obama’s birth certificate. Please send the proof as offered or as filed if it was abstracted. If these records are already public, please give me directions on where to find them.”
Okubo’s response:
“The Department of Health has no records responsive to this UIPA request.”
I also asked for an ‘adoption’ birth certificate:
“I request an electronic copy of President Obama’s supplemental birth certificate(s).”
Okubo’s response:
“The Department has no records that respond to your UIPA request.”
Did Obama amend his ‘Date of Birth’ on his birth certificate? If so, why? Was he born before Hawaii was a state? Did the non-binding resolution on July 28 give evidence to the facts of his ‘Date of Birth?’
Please help answer the question by sending similar UIPA requests to the DoH. Thanks!
[UPDATE: I have asked that Ms. Okubo clarify her response to my question about 'Date of Birth.' I would like for others to ask, too, though.=)]
[UPDATE 2: Just to be clear, I do not disagree that all THREE answers are interesting. But if Obama changed a date that was too early, like before Hawaii was a state, why would the DoH have a birth record for a man that wasn't born yet?]
[UPDATE 3: I just noticed that Ms. Okubo answered my request about 'Date of Birth' first. FYI, it was the second of the three that I sent today. Therefore, she was not referencing either of my other two requests sent today. I believe she was referencing the request I made for "ALL of President Obama's vital records" two months ago. I was denied access to them citing §HRS338-18.]