Her e-mail is funny. First, we can watch the video, and it doesn’t look at all like what Martha said was really happening. Also, in the video, the announcer says she talked to “many troops”, but in her e-mail she says she didn’t talk to many troops — so I guess her report was a lie then?
And she said a person behind her couldn’t have heard what was being said, but it sure looked pretty quiet to me, and it also looked from the video like she could have easily asked 60 people who they were voting for.
Note she said she was surprised at how many said Obama — which suggests she had done some sort of quick survey. Maybe she didn’t interview 60, but she may well have asked 60 in order to pick out the 5 she picked.
Two woman in her group of 5, and two minorities.
Quick... tell Chris Matthews - he may get that strange leg thing again...in anticipation of another sneaky ‘win’.
This is the liberal media’s way. They keep interviewing until they find someone who gives them the answers that they want (that match their assumptions).
I heard locally a woman call in to talk radio. She had a family member in the service. I can’t recall the specifics; if this was election time and she was being asked about a dead/absent son/husband in service or Christmas asked about an absent son/husband...
Anyway, she was slated to appear live on the morning news, she and others gave their interviews. She was pro-military in her remarks in a way that surprised the interviewer. Subsequent rebroadcasts (at noon and evening) included remarks by some of the families but not hers. Depends on “what you have to say” whether the media cares or not.