Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARC Protest of Movie: "Tropic Thunder"
08/08/08 | vanity

Posted on 08/08/2008 1:20:50 PM PDT by genefromjersey

(A good friend, who works with the mentally handicapped forwarded a copy of this letter.)

Contact Us | The Arc Website 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 650, Silver Spring, MD 20910 | 301.565.3842 ACTION ALERT - Offensive Portrayal of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Movie Scheduled for Release on August 13, 2008August 5, 2008To: State and Local Chapter LeadersFrom: Peter V. Berns, Executive Director

The following is important information about a movie - Tropic Thunder - that includes a very negative portrayal of a person with intellectual disabilities as well as extensive use of the R-word. Release of this movie was discussed at the NCE meeting last week, as well as The Arc Board of Directors meeting on Sunday & Monday. We now want to make sure everyone has the most current information available.BackgroundTropic Thunder is a comedy/action/adventure scheduled for release on August 13 and promises to be one of the blockbusters of the summer. DreamWorks is the film's producer and Paramount is its distributor.

The film features popular actors Ben Stiller, Robert Downey Jr. and Jack Black as self-absorbed actors filming a big-budget war movie on location. Through a series of freak occurrences, they are forced to become the soldiers they are portraying.

Stiller plays Tugg Speedman, a fading action star who earlier failed in his bid for an Oscar as "Simple Jack," a man with an intellectual disability. "Simple Jack" is featured as a film-within-a-film, with Stiller sporting a classic institutional bowl haircut and bad teeth. The film within-a-film's promotional poster (below) bears the subtitle "Once upon a time there was a retard." Elsewhere is the slogan "What he doesn't have in his head, he makes up for in his heart." A satirical plot synopsis quotes a critic as saying that Speedman's Jack was "one of the most retarded performances in cinema history."While we have not yet seen the movie, from what has been publicly available it is clear that the film is a very negative portrayal of people with intellectual disabilities. There has been mounting outrage from the disability community. For excellent coverage of the issue, you may want to visit the website www.patriciaebauer.com and review her posts and responsive comments over the past week. Hundreds of comments have been posted on the blog expressing outrage about the movie. Promotional materials for the movie included an offensive website www.simplejakemovie.com that now appears to be no longer operational since since The Arc and other disability groups started asking questions about the film

I am flying out to Los Angeles on Wednesday August 6 to meet with DreamWorks Chief Executive Officer and studio executives from in Los Angeles, California on Wednesday, August 6. I will be joining Joe Meadours, The Arc board member and executive director of People First of California, as well as representatives of other national disability organizations. The purpose of the meeting is to express our concerns, request a viewing of the film, and discuss possible solutions.Call to Action Will FollowThe Arc national staff will be back in touch with you later in the week to provide an update about the meeting. Depending on the outcome of the meeting, one option being considered is to call for a national boycott of the film and to urge state and local chapters of The Arc to go to the movies on August 13, 2008 with protest signs as well as appropriate informational literature. As events unfold, we will send you additional information via email alerts. Also watch the hompage of The Arc website where we will plan to post talking points and other information to help you organize and take action. In particular, we will soon be posting to the site talking points about why the R-word is hate speech.In the meantime there are a few preparations you can begin to make:>review your communications options (email lists, etc) and think about how you will get the word out about this movie,>compile a list of local media that you will want to reach out to about the issue,>identify parents and self-advocates that you would like to have speak out,>begin to draft op-ed articles and letters to the editor about the issue,>identify other organizations that may be allies (e.g. ACLU, NAACP, other civil rights groups, other disability groups) that have networks you will also want to mobilize,>talk to younger staff about how some of the social networking sites could be used to take action.In short, please do your best to begin preparations for a massive action. Again, we will be back to you with further information after the meeting.Peter The Arc - Web Privacy Statement (Privacy Page)Community - Member Email Subscriptions (Email Preferences Page)


TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: handicapped; hollywood; mentally; portrayal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2008 1:20:51 PM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

Still gonna see it.
If you’re offending somebody, you’re doing something right.


2 posted on 08/08/2008 1:23:19 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
I think the film-within-a-film was intended to be a sendup of Sean Penn's performance in the cloying and patronizing I Am Sam.

Robert Downey Jr.'s performance in the film is also highly controversial - albeit with regard to another community instead of the cognitively challenged.

3 posted on 08/08/2008 1:24:47 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
...very negative portrayal of a person with intellectual disabilities

You mean... actors?

4 posted on 08/08/2008 1:26:08 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
You mean... actors?

Heh, good one.

5 posted on 08/08/2008 1:28:05 PM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
You mean... actors?

Heh, good one.

6 posted on 08/08/2008 1:28:29 PM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

So now we have “the R word.”

Sheeze.


7 posted on 08/08/2008 1:29:45 PM PDT by JennysCool (A man who served his country well vs. a walking Che poster. Is it really that tough a choice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: techcor
That was my first double post in years. It wasn't my fault. The computer hiccuped.
8 posted on 08/08/2008 1:29:49 PM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
Retarded is now hate speech? What about tard?


9 posted on 08/08/2008 1:30:41 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Robert Downey Jr.'s performance in the film is also highly controversial - albeit with regard to another community instead of the cognitively challenged.

Uh, what?

LOL
10 posted on 08/08/2008 1:30:42 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting Conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

Well, I for one would rather gouge out my eyes than watch another Ben Stiller “comedy”.


11 posted on 08/08/2008 1:31:46 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yea, apparently Robert Downy Jr. attempted to act.. it insulted actors.


12 posted on 08/08/2008 1:31:47 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

WTF is the R word...retarded?


13 posted on 08/08/2008 1:31:59 PM PDT by Devilinbaggypants (He who wishes to give little shouldn't ask for much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I am going to take the short bus and see this movie.


14 posted on 08/08/2008 1:32:29 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: techcor
That was my first double post in years. It wasn't my fault. The computer hiccuped.

A nice 2 oz pour of this is guaranteed to cure hiccups. If the computer refuses to drink it, drink it yourself.


15 posted on 08/08/2008 1:35:12 PM PDT by tx_eggman (Privatizing profits and socializing losses is no way to run an economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

ping for the tard ping list


16 posted on 08/08/2008 1:35:25 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
17 posted on 08/08/2008 1:37:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting Conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
I hope they throw this group of whiners out of their office. I hope who ever coined the phrase above “the R word” feels like an “R word” when they realize that they could have said “retard” in reference to what was said without any risk of offending anyone.

What a load of trash. People should grow up. It's a comedy. Stiller's character is supposed to be an idiot for being in a movie that would have such a ludicrous promotional poster. The characters who use the term “retards” are idiots and that is displayed by the fact that they are using the word “retard” so much and so so derisively.

Further , all of the above being obvious, I hope this group feels bad for exploiting their children's needs in order to promote the group that is supposed to be looking out for their needs. They have no problem piggybacking on the fame of a movie that they are disparaging.

18 posted on 08/08/2008 1:38:02 PM PDT by GulfBreeze (Vote for John McCain along with Tom DeLay, John Cornyn and the majority of conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

So wait a minute, let me see if I understand this.

The movie (actual) established that one character is a jerk by showing that he once appeared in a Forest Gump ripoff complete with stupid slogans and ARC thinks this is insulting the disabled?

They really should be paying attention to context.


19 posted on 08/08/2008 1:39:05 PM PDT by boogerbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Sounds like a great idea!


20 posted on 08/08/2008 1:39:48 PM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson