Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: reg45

This is an end-run around the Constitution. In order to have the system you suggest, the Constitution would have to be amended. In effect, it is undermining the concept of federalism.


11 posted on 09/06/2008 4:59:50 AM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

I’m surprised someone hasn’t taken this all the way to the Supreme Court. They would definitely rule against it.


23 posted on 09/06/2008 5:24:28 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
This is an end-run around the Constitution. In order to have the system you suggest, the Constitution would have to be amended. In effect, it is undermining the concept of federalism.

There is nothing in the Constitution mandating a popular vote.

Article II, Section 1:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
If the state legislature chose to, it could take the presidential election off the Nov 4 ballot entirely, and decide who the state's electoral vote goes to by legislation
45 posted on 09/06/2008 6:22:14 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson