Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana
There is no precedence for disqualifying a president AFTER he has been elected

The "election" of the president is actually when the electors meet. Isn't that in December? As for disqualification, the US Constitution is the supreme law. What's to argue with that?

34 posted on 10/28/2008 6:16:20 AM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: XHogPilot

“The “election” of the president is actually when the electors meet. Isn’t that in December? As for disqualification, the US Constitution is the supreme law. What’s to argue with that? “

Here’s my conspiracy leaning take on this whole thing. barack was not born in the state - obvious, mainly because of his sealing any birth doco, and his travels. After being elected, or stealing the election via fraud, he is going to announce that he pulled an end-around on our constitution, thus making it null and void, then declaring that elections are no longer needed and he will be our leader until his death.


42 posted on 10/28/2008 6:29:52 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (It is amazing how people are comforted by percentages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: XHogPilot

As for disqualification, the US Constitution is the supreme law. What’s to argue with that?
__________________________________________

But it’s never been used to disqualify an elected POTUS...


50 posted on 10/28/2008 6:42:27 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (McCain/Palin Now that's a ticket that deserves a tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson