To: All
2 posted on
10/28/2008 4:46:39 PM PDT by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Go Pumas!!!!!
Join your fellow Americans, and defeat the Obama thugs!!!
4 posted on
10/28/2008 4:49:51 PM PDT by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Source for those figures about the college students?
6 posted on
10/28/2008 4:50:14 PM PDT by
Tears of a Clown
(The Obamessiah has risen. All hail the One.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I think the Hillary voters (PUMA'S) are the silent vote in this election and they will be heard on Nov 4th. I think you are on to something...I take that back, I'm positive you are on to something...
7 posted on
10/28/2008 4:50:26 PM PDT by
Bush Revolution
("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."...Let's win this thing)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The article errs in attributing the polling differences to oversampling of Democrats and under sampling of Republicans.
Rather, it's the over assignment of those polled to the "independent/undecided" category.
As long as the pollster has a reasonable idea of what percentage of the electorate belongs to which party it really doesn't matter how many of each party get polled. All that will happen is the pollster will get a better number from one set of voters than another.
If, on the other hand, the pollster takes all his Democrat respondents who might vote for McCain and calls them independents, but does not also reduce the percentage of Democrats in the total sampling universe, he simply gives each Obama vote greater weight and thereby distorts the results.
These guys all know that 20% of white Democrats will not vote for Obama under any circumstances. That's about 12% of all Democrats!
By calling them independents they give Obama as much as a 15% lead over McCain.
13 posted on
10/28/2008 4:56:01 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Death to vanities and searing pain to those who post them.
16 posted on
10/28/2008 4:57:10 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
What say you? I say that if I believed polls from reputable pollsters I'd think Obama was up by 13 in Pennsylvania. If I'm not going to believe them why should I believe some unknown, unnamed poll just because it slams Hillary?
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I’ve been saying this for a LONG time, and been greeted with skepticism by some on this forum.
However I used a number half as big as this.
36 posted on
10/28/2008 5:16:00 PM PDT by
George Smiley
(Palin is the real deal.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Maybe it’s the Hillary effect. Tell the pollsters one thing. Vote another.
38 posted on
10/28/2008 5:17:35 PM PDT by
wny
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I say, Thank God for Hillary Clinton!
(Looking up for lightning.)
62 posted on
10/28/2008 6:42:44 PM PDT by
right way right
(Do not mistake religion for God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson