Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2; browardchad
"It’s important to note, that although these states have created these laws, a large number of scholars believe that such state-level laws hold no true bearing and would not survive constitutional challenge."

No, actually its irrelevent to note that erroneous opinion. Each state's electors are chosen, and behave, as per state laws. Federal law cannot regulate how the states vote.

116 posted on 11/22/2008 4:56:18 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
No, actually its irrelevent to note that erroneous opinion. Each state's electors are chosen, and behave, as per state laws. Federal law cannot regulate how the states vote.

That sidebar was in reference to punitive laws for "faithless electors." The SCOTUS has largely, as it should, deferred to the states in their regulation of electors, but the punitive measures -- fines, etc., for those not voting for the popular vote winner -- has never been challenged.

219 posted on 11/23/2008 12:52:52 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson