Yes, it seems after they released it on his website, and before factcheck.org got to take some pictures, lots was added that was questioned before.
Have you seen the information on his supposed Selective Service Registration?
Yes, and that one has at least as many inconsistencies as the phony bc does.
Registration numbers wrong, dates wrong, PO stamp wrong, wrong form, etc. It appears to me that all of this was cobbled together hastily by rank amateurs who thought they could outsmart millions of peoples' scrutiny.
I also want to re-stress the importance of the missing paper impressions on the original bc scan. This is a smoking gun of magnitude, and is prima facie evidence of the commission of the federal offense of forgery of a government document with intent to defraud.
Let someone from camp Obama try to convince a judge that the bc was only folded after it was scanned into a computer. They can't, because the heavy, embossed seal impression is missing from the original scan, too.
BOOM-SHAKA-LAKA!