Posted on 01/03/2009 1:58:35 PM PST by Puzo1
There is no proof that he was born here.
His father, a British subject, was not born here, and Obama acquired British citizenship at birth.
His mother was ineligible to pass along her US citizenship to Obama at birth, if she, in fact had US citizenship, but
There is no proof that his mother was a US citizen at the time of his birth, either.
The only evidence he has provided in support of his claim to be a US citizen and natural-born is a forged identification document.
The "natural-born" crap, as you derisively call it, is called the Constitution: it is the Law of the Land and the President must swear an Oath to protect, preserve, and to defend it.
Anyone who violates this Oath is a traitor.
Anyone who seeks to destroy the Constitution is a traitor.
Anyone who seeks to subvert or weaken the Constitution is a traitor.
You would be better served to learn about the Constitution and US History then to continue making these bogus, irrelevant arguments.
Jan 9. Conference on Berg's writ of certiori
Jan 16: Conference on Berg's injunction to stay the certification of Obama as President until Obama proves his Constitutional eligibility.
Yes.
We did not have standing because Obama was not officially elected as President. By Friday, everyone will have standing.
There are and they are called, "Democrats." The term, "working across the aisle," is a euphemism for kissing butt. With both Houses of Congress in control of the Democrats, the Republicans have to play nice, or go into time-out until 2010.
Just being a citizen is not a high enough level to meet what the framers aimed for in president. I can see why this is confusing to a liberal mindset ... if the Constitution is to be transmogrified into a ‘living document’ to suit liberals, it must evolve as the dumbed-down mob demands. Some numbnut liberals have to be insulted to make them come back to rational for a short spell. But, as you evidence, it doesn’t last long.
Punaciously excellent.
You’re not only not the sharpest knife in the drawer - you appear to be a rolling pin.
Sharp/intelligent people don’t need to stoop to name calling...nothing to add to the discussion. Why bother?
We could still use it to claim his illegitimacy. The way they did to Bush after 2000. Obama can play Mr. President all he wants — I’ll never see it that way and he’ll never get my respect. Any good judge of character could see through his facade.
Well you can't debate a rolling pin. It just parrots the same responses over and over no mater how many people prove it wrong, nor how great the empirical evidence that it is wrong.
Rolling pins aren't known for their sharp wit.
All you can do is to point out to it and to others - "hey, that's a rolling pin".
I wouldn’t call you a traitor...however you are twisting the constitution for no purpose. It won’t work.
I guess your post is an example of what you believe passes for ‘wit’...my advice is ...keep your day job!
Sorry - I meant father’s/parent’s religion listing. So, you’re saying that has never been listed on any bc in the US. Are you also then saying that you suspect there is nothing at all to hide? I really do suspect the reason for obscuring this matter has more to do with a link to the Muslim background of Obama.
Why would you? I've already recited my Oath of Allegiance to this Country and pledged to support and defend the Constitution, and the laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
...however you are twisting the constitution for no purpose. It won’t work.
Do you even know what is in the Oath? Can Obama honestly recite this now?
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
Which part of "not showing his birth certificate," is he demonstrating support and defense of the Constitution and laws of the United States of America?
I don’t think there is any real doubt Obama was born in Hawaii...so this settles it for me. He was born in this country-it’s my opinion.
He may be hiding something, or he may have the type of personality that says, “If you are an a$$h&*e I refuse to cooperate with you if I can get away with it,” and he thinks all Republicans/conservatives are a$$h&*es automatically. So he's yanking our chain by not asking Hawaii to release the birth certificate. I personally believe both to be the case, but I don't know anything more than anyone else.
And I won't begrudge you to have an opinion. I have one, too.
Regardless of our opinions, however, the fact remains that he has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to prevent anyone from ever seeing his original birth certificate and knowing where he was born and to whom.
Polarik, who is bankrolling this nonsense you (or the committee of you) you post.
Look- I appreciate your concern for the constitution. I wish more people were concerned. Obama would not have been elected. We may disagree but I mean no disrespect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.