Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REASONS WHY OBAMA WILL NEITHER PUBLICLY SPEAK ABOUT WHERE HE WAS BORN NOR PRODUCE HIS ORIGINAL BC
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. ^ | January 3, 2008 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Posted on 01/03/2009 1:58:35 PM PST by Puzo1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last
To: TigersEye

Ooops, you are correct. Sorry!


101 posted on 01/04/2009 12:46:37 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Well, I've never posted anything incorrect! /s lol
102 posted on 01/04/2009 1:10:17 AM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

A pecker would.


103 posted on 01/04/2009 3:05:00 AM PST by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap

Wouldn’t that be great? They should at least ask Obama why, since John McCain immediately produced his birth certificate in response to similar questions, Obama will not do the same. Clearly, the digitized image of a document which Obama’s campaign posted on a friendly web site and e-mailed to clueless reporters does not prove anything.

SCOTUS: Stop playing cards in your chambers and get to work. There is an important constitutional question before you!


104 posted on 01/04/2009 5:18:31 AM PST by OneTimeComment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated; anniegetyourgun
The boy is NOT black. He is Caucasoid, no matter what his “skin tone” (which is also not black) indicates. His father, black as he was, was a Kenyan, and they are classed as Caucasoid. Daddy was 1/8 Negroid, enough in the USofA to be legally called “black” — but Barry Zero is only 1/16 Negroid ancestry.

The central problem for your hypothesis is that nowhere in the United States medical or legal system is there a means by which one is classified as this or that race (with the exception of so-called "native American" because of their usually dual citizenship status and now by them as a means of keeping others out of the portion of the, at least formerly, lucrative gaming industry open to "native" Americans; and there you actually have to demonstrate it). No one going into a hospital to give birth anywhere in this country, even 50 years ago, is questioned as to the relative percentages of racial mixture of one's parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents for the purpose of determining whether one is this or that race.
105 posted on 01/04/2009 5:37:25 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

Gee, I wish I have known you when you were screaming for conservatives to lay off Bill Clinton and his Lewinsky scandals.

/sarc


106 posted on 01/04/2009 6:37:06 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1

BTL after January 9


107 posted on 01/04/2009 7:27:51 AM PST by Polarik (Polarik's Principle:" A forgery created to prove a claim will repudiate that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan; anniegetyourgun
The central problem for your hypothesis is that nowhere in the United States medical or legal system is there a means by which one is classified as this or that race . . .

Yes there IS . . . and it's on my blog somewhere and I don't have time to find it. There is a % rule for people who wish to classify themselves by race. A person must have a great-grandparent who is a full-blood of that race/ethnicity to claim to be that race/ethnic group.

Barack SENIOR had a great-grandparent who was Negroid making him 1/8 Negroid. He only passed 1/16 of that to his son. Technically, legally, Barry Dunham is not "black" by the percentage of Negoid blood. He is Caucasoid.

http://racialreality.110mb.com/subraces.html
East African: In the deserts and highlands of Ethiopia, Eritrea, and the Somalilands is found a concentration of several related Mediterranean types, mixed in varying degrees with negroes. To the west these partial whites border on Sudanese negroes; to the southwest the partially Hamitic tribes of Kenya and Uganda form art extension of the peripheral Mediterranean racial area. To the north, the Beja-Bisharin group of Hamitic-speaking nomads connect the East African Hamitic-speaking peoples with their wholly white Egyptian and Berber relatives of North Africa.


This is Barry Dunham Obama Zero's race.

http://racialreality.110mb.com/skincolor.html
Pigmentation is the most readily visible signifier of race, and as such it's often used by laymen to detect bi-racial ancestry. Yet it's also the least reliable from this standpoint, as it changes in response to climatic and environmental conditions, both seasonal and long-term, and can vary greatly within genetically differentiated populations (i.e. races).
108 posted on 01/04/2009 8:44:13 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (YOU can get your own Bail Out . . .Dec 18 post at http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thanx. I’m trying to keep up with the various threads.


109 posted on 01/04/2009 8:49:29 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: null and void
a Kenyan, and they are classed as Caucasoid.

Source please?


http://racialreality.110mb.com/subraces.html
East African: In the deserts and highlands of Ethiopia, Eritrea, and the Somalilands is found a concentration of several related Mediterranean types, mixed in varying degrees with negroes. To the west these partial whites border on Sudanese negroes; to the southwest the partially Hamitic tribes of Kenya and Uganda form art extension of the peripheral Mediterranean racial area. To the north, the Beja-Bisharin group of Hamitic-speaking nomads connect the East African Hamitic-speaking peoples with their wholly white Egyptian and Berber relatives of North Africa.


Pigmentation is the most readily visible signifier of race, and as such it's often used by laymen to detect bi-racial ancestry. Yet it's also the least reliable from this standpoint, as it changes in response to climatic and environmental conditions, both seasonal and long-term, and can vary greatly within genetically differentiated populations (i.e. races).
http://racialreality.110mb.com/skincolor.html
110 posted on 01/04/2009 8:51:57 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (YOU can get your own Bail Out . . .Dec 18 post at http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Polarik; LucyT; STARWISE; Calpernia; pissant; Fred Nerks; Kevmo; Gemsbok; FARS
Polarik's Principle:" A forgery created to prove a claim will repudiate that claim"

111 posted on 01/04/2009 8:52:12 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

Thanks.


112 posted on 01/04/2009 9:02:04 AM PST by null and void (Petroglyphs. The original cliffs notes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

The reason anchor babies are a problem is because they are citizens. You wrap yourself in the constitution and twist it to serve your purposes. Well, I don’t think your interpretation would serve this nation well, and I think you are wrong. Insults will not make what you say true.


113 posted on 01/04/2009 9:17:53 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

It’s extremely time consuming and I am neglected other things that I should be doing! But it is so fascinating and earth shaking that I can’t just forget about it.

ANd not because it’s humorous or LOL-inducing, either...it’s historical and dreadful in the real sense of the word.


114 posted on 01/04/2009 9:18:03 AM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

It is personally frustrating to see something which could so simply be resolved, delayed, ignored, and denied. This isn’t the JFK assassination or Chinagate. It can be simply resolved one way or the other. The fact that OB doesn’t do so, is the biggest indication of the kind of president he will be in a crisis.


115 posted on 01/04/2009 9:23:51 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Thanks, Phil, for addding the Polarik Principle

. Y'know, I never get tired of looking at that graphic!

116 posted on 01/04/2009 9:38:14 AM PST by Polarik (Polarik's Principle:" A forgery created to prove a claim will repudiate that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
The reason anchor babies are a problem is because they are citizens. You wrap yourself in the constitution and twist it to serve your purposes. Well, I don’t think your interpretation would serve this nation well, and I think you are wrong. Insults will not make what you say true.

To things that Lefties cannot seem to fathom: one, the difference between Palestinian terrorism and Israel's efforts to stop it, and two, why a President has to be a natural-born US citizen, and not just a plain, old citizen. You can be a Senator or a Representative if you're not a natural-born citizen, but you cannot become the President.

117 posted on 01/04/2009 9:43:05 AM PST by Polarik (Polarik's Principle:" A forgery created to prove a claim will repudiate that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Barak Obama has been declared eligible to be president. None of this natural born nonsense will change this. No court including SCOTUS will change anything. It has been established law for many years that if a child is born here , he is a US citizen and could become president. The natural born crap has to do with the early years when many Americans were born in Britain or in British occupied American. You would be better served to work on 2010 than continue these tortured, useless arguments.


118 posted on 01/04/2009 9:47:05 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
They should, we all should. Could a team of lawyers be hired to represent hundreds of thousands of Americans demanding he prove his eligibility? Absolutely! I have the lawyers in mind, too. We have to be able to show tangible harm done to us as citizens, and not just hypothetical harm. I think that we could make the case for being placed directly at-risk by a person who has shown contempt for the Constitution, who would adversely affect our Constitutional rights, who was responsible for the housing crisis and bank crisis and would worsen the economy even more with dire consequences to us, who may have been born in a foreign country hostile to the US and who may be an illegal alien, who was raised in a country hostile to the US, who has been given all of America's secrets and would gain access to America's armed forces and their nukes, who has active ties to subversive anti-American groups and individuals, who intends on conscripting young people into a n unconstitutional "mandatory work force," who has disenfranchised voters by perpetrating document fraud and voter fraud to get elected, and who has zero credibility to serve as our nation's leader at home, and to represent our nation in any international capacity.

Or, something to that effect.

119 posted on 01/04/2009 10:11:43 AM PST by Polarik (Polarik's Principle:" A forgery created to prove a claim will repudiate that claim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: nominal
Well show me where it’s defined to include dual-citizens?

It is a basic principle of a common-law legal system that if something is not forbidden by law, it is allowed. If someone is a citizen from birth, 35 years old and has been a resident of the US for 14 years, then their other characterisics aren't relevant- they're qualified to be President.

I also doubt Congress could legally make an amendment defining it to include dual-citizens even if they wanted to.

There is no legal or Constitutional limit on what can go into a Constitutional amendment.

120 posted on 01/04/2009 10:19:27 AM PST by Citizen Blade ("A Conservative Government is an organized hypocrisy" -Benjamin Disraeli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson