Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REASONS WHY OBAMA WILL NEITHER PUBLICLY SPEAK ABOUT WHERE HE WAS BORN NOR PRODUCE HIS ORIGINAL BC
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. ^ | January 3, 2008 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Posted on 01/03/2009 1:58:35 PM PST by Puzo1

Provides the reasons why Obama refuses to either speak publicly about where he was born or to produce his original birth certificate


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamatruthfile; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: television is just wrong
he should have to prove he is able to be inaugurated. not the other way around.

I had to show a BC to get my passport. If I had denied access to it, they would have denied my passport. Why is the same not true for holding the highest office in the land?

41 posted on 01/03/2009 4:11:32 PM PST by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: exit82
MK, excellent summary of what we know.
May I use it? I’m feeling a letter to the editor coming on.....


By all means, feel free. Anything I post can be republished, reposted, copied, etc., with or without attribution.

We're all in this together, good luck!
42 posted on 01/03/2009 4:16:43 PM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap

I can tell you what his immediate response will be: ‘Uh, those issues are of a Constitutional nature, er, are, um, they, er are items involved in um several court cases, so, er uh it would be inappropriate for me, er [Axelrod screaming in the hideden earpiece to shut the hell up] ... at this time I am restrained from answering those questions because of litigation. Um, next question?


43 posted on 01/03/2009 4:19:12 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1

Maybe he is legitimate, but after basing himself as the first black president, the embarassment would be that he’s really caucasian.


44 posted on 01/03/2009 4:19:55 PM PST by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1

Bookmarking

Good stuff, thanks for posting it here for us and welcome!!


45 posted on 01/03/2009 4:24:11 PM PST by WestCoastGal (If we will hold the course, God in Heaven will raise up friends to help fight these battles.P Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Great article. Thanks for posting.


46 posted on 01/03/2009 4:26:18 PM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Something tells me it says “muslim” on the bc under religion.

No birth certificate issued within the United States of America has ever had a slot for “religion”.

And anyway, when you ask a newborn their religion, they without fail refuse to answer the question.

47 posted on 01/03/2009 4:27:48 PM PST by Cheburashka (Liberalism: a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1
Only you can end this controversy: Mr. Obama, release your original birth certificate.

All we are saying is
Give release a chance

48 posted on 01/03/2009 4:28:13 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nbhunt

You ask a pertinent question! IMHO, the Republicans are playing this the way they manipulated the clinton impeachment ... string it out so that the guilty bastard is not removed and remains in offcie damaged goods to play off of for the next election cycle. The problem with that is, Republicans do not deserve and will not get returned to power by an electorate so shamefully ignored. And the demcorats are never going to relinquish their power now. Why should they, the American people have shown they are now corrupted and do not give a stinky poop about the Constitution, believing the party in power is the law ... and they would be correct, the criminal enterprise democrat party is now the law because the elected Republicans are too damned corrupt to stand up for America and the people who sent their shameful butts to Congress! Democrats rare just being the criminals they have always been. Republicans are now the feckless wussies asking to be walked all over so long as they can remain on the federal dole.


49 posted on 01/03/2009 4:28:27 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

My guess is that under RACE it shows “Caucasian” or “Caucasoid” and not Negroid. That would have been the term used in 1961.

The boy is NOT black. He is Caucasoid, no matter what his “skin tone” (which is also not black) indicates. His father, black as he was, was a Kenyan, and they are classed as Caucasoid. Daddy was 1/8 Negroid, enough in the USofA to be legally called “black” — but Barry Zero is only 1/16 Negroid ancestry.

My money is on the Birth Certificate listing him as Caucasian. And that would totally destroy everything on which he has built his narcissistic persona.


50 posted on 01/03/2009 4:30:42 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (YOU can get your own Bail Out . . .Dec 18 post at http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: HighlyOpinionated
a Kenyan, and they are classed as Caucasoid.

Source please?

52 posted on 01/03/2009 4:41:51 PM PST by null and void (Petroglyphs. The original cliffs notes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated; LucyT; Kevmo; little jeremiah; BP2; unspun
I've entertained the notion that Barack Obama, arrogant s.o.w. that he is, believing he's smarter than a sitting SCOTUS black judge who is proven brillaint, assumed he was eligible due to his mother's citizenship even though he was born out of the country and his father was a British Subject.

When someone first challenged his cherished self-deceit (common with narcissistic personality disorder), he looked at the issue again and discovered that he had missed the citizenship laws in effect in 1961 and his mother would not be old enough to have passed her citizenship to him. His way of dealing with this error was typical narcissist, he clammed up, enlisted thousands to protect his image and his deceits, and arrogantly rode out the storms with his affirmative action pecker in the air, disdaining the chattel snapping at his royal heels, defying them to prove he is not eligible.

The affirmative action fraud's sycophantic minions at FR have used that same approach to dissemble the issues. [Pecker is a British euphemism for nose, BTW, which seemed appropriate for this British subject pretending to be an American citizen.]

53 posted on 01/03/2009 4:46:56 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I was about to agree with everything except the pecker part, glad you explained that.

Your writing has gotten very poignant and stark lately. Keep up the good work.


54 posted on 01/03/2009 4:58:32 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
No hospital, medical center or clinic in Hawaii has been willing to state that 0bama was born in their facilities in 1961.

No doctor, nurse, or medical professional, working or retired, has come forward to say “I delivered Barack Hussein Obama, and the delivery was in Hawaii”.

Neither means a thing, you can not prove a thesis with a negative premise.

If you state that snapping your fingers keeps the tigers away and your proof is that there are no tiger attacks, you have committed a logical fallacy. There might be numerous reasons why there no tiger attacks, perhaps there are no tigers.

Perhaps the reason he remains silent on the issue is that he can see no controlling legal authority that could compel him to prove his suitability to serve as president. So far he seems to be winning on that point alone.

His background has been so completely sanitized that the only evidence left is negative and cannot be used to prove anything. Even the lack of evidence is negative, albeit highly suggestive.

Regards,
GtG

55 posted on 01/03/2009 4:59:35 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade

Obama is 47...lets assume the doctor was 28 (young). He would be 73. Also, how would they remember anyway...Do you think they said ah...someday he will be president, we must make a note of this birth...come on. How many babies do you think doctors and nurses deliver during their career? Even the Berg lawsuit concedes he was born in Hawaii. If he was born in Hawaii, he can be president. The rest of this stuff is silly. Do you guys realize that Bobby Jindals parents were from a foreign country. You wan him excluded from running for president?


56 posted on 01/03/2009 5:06:08 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy

Well, obamanoid troll, why should your opinion be any more weighty than anyone else’s? Can you prove he was born in Hawai’i and if he was, can you prove he is therefore eligible? No, you cannot. As to Bobby Jindal, you democrat troll, Bobby is not eligible to be presdient if when he was born his parents were not US citizens. Now go buzz around back at DU where you came from. Perhaps you and janx can exchange ridicule pleasantries.


57 posted on 01/03/2009 5:10:32 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Blade
"Even assuming anybody involved in the delivery is still alive and remembers the delivery 47 years later, they would still be ethically and legally barred from discussing this." I thought all the Christmas turkeys were gone by now. You're so wrong it isn't even amusing to refute your idiocy ... unless you know of some 'injunction' in HI which states Obama will sue anyone talking about his history. You obamanoid trolls need to regroup at DU and change your strategies. You look absolutely idiotic trying to float this crap. BTW, what is David Axelrod's handle at DU?
58 posted on 01/03/2009 5:14:29 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: quintr
I do not understand why each and every taxpayer/voter in the United States is denied “standing” by the Supreme Court

I think that is what really drives most people on this issue. If the citizens do not have standing to compel a candidate to prove that he/she is eligible to hold the highest office in the 'free' world, then we have nothing. The Constitution means nothing and we are just stepping stones for anyone with enough guts to take over.

59 posted on 01/03/2009 5:17:21 PM PST by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I can’t prove anything...I merely pointed out that Bergs suit says he was born in Hawaii but for a complicated set of reasons (in comprehensible),Berg says he is not natural born. Bobby Jindal is eligible because he was born in this country. This is quite silly. I have been of FR for years. My wife nyconse has been on for nine years-everyone who disagrees with you is not a troll my friend.


60 posted on 01/03/2009 5:18:11 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson