However, the Keyes case isn't about proving the COLB is a forgery. It is about Obama not presenting any evidence of natural born citizenship. All Obama points to are two things. First, the scanned COLB image. Now even if that were genuine, it does not establish natural born status. This is a civil case. Therefore, all Keyes has to show is by a preponderance of the evidence ( a slight tipping of the scales ) that the COLB presented is not to be trusted. You don't even have to go into any forensic analysis for that. By their own admission, they blacked out the Certificate number. That shows an alteration was made to the document. Even if a court were to accept a scanned image into evidence ( which no court would ), just that fact that they altered it would be a slight tipping of the scales that the document cannot be trusted. But the more inconsistencies you can show , the better. The second thing they point to are the photos of the document and their "experts" declaring it is genuine. Well first off, those are photographs, not scans, taken at a distance with insufficient lighting. If they were truly honest, they would have taken a high resolution TIFF scan of the document ( both front and back ).Secondly , their "experts". No where do they give their names, their qualifications, or a report detailing how they arrived at their conclusion. No court would just let that statement form their website come in as evidence ( this is assuming there is a honest judge ) :-)Therefore the only defense Obama would have in court is to produced an actual certified copy of the BC
The second thing they point to are the photos of the document and their “experts” declaring it is genuine. Well first off, those are photographs, not scans, taken at a distance with insufficient lighting.
***And it was Polarik’s 160 page report that focused on the inconsistencies in the 2nd document, showing it also to be a forgery. One more tip of the scales.