[RogerFGay]

ping

[Wonder Warthog]

"But let’s look at the question again. Has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures? “Significant” means anything from barely measurable to important to perhaps the primary cause. It is my impression that many scientists believe human activity has an effect on climate or think there might be – although most often that effect is thought to be very, very small."

There are NO scientists who believe that mankind's emission of CO2 has NOT contributed to the global climate cycle. The only valid question is "how much, compared to other factors". And right now, the correct answer is "not very damned much".

[pappyone]

For more confusion on this article go to http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090119210532.htm.
This article states that 10,200 “experts” around the world were contacted, 3,146 agree with MMGW.

[buffyt]

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/05/24/global-warming-debate-has-anyone-noticed-that-its-over/

Another really GOOD ONE! I heard that there was a new Rasmussen poll about glowbull warming and less than half of those polled think human caused global warming exists, most said it is a natural climate cycle.

[The Great RJ]

Global warming is being undermined by real science. Theories in science are not based on consensus, but on being able to demonstrate with further experiments that the theory is indeed correct. The CO2 driven man caused global warming theory is failing because more and more actual experiments and data analysis do not support the hypothesis. Al Gore’s charge that no further research was needed as there was a consensus of scientists who blindly accepted the theory was the antithesis of true science.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !