Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PercivalWalks

A father is on the hook for 18 years whether he wants the child or not. The mother can shirk her own responsibilties to that child if she decides to kill it.

Our nation is screwed.


2 posted on 01/27/2009 8:38:53 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Obama thinks spending tax $ on abortions in Mexico helps more than controlling illegal imigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

This is, IMO, the biggest reason why fewer people are having children.


4 posted on 01/27/2009 8:46:38 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

It shouldnt matter whether he wants the child or not, if he helped create the child, he should help support the child. So should the woman.


16 posted on 01/27/2009 9:22:45 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (I home school because I have seen the village and I don't want it raising my kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

Given current administrative rules,

then the father has the right to choose too.

He can chose to pay for 1/2 the abortion and not ever see the child again.

The price of fatherhood is 1/2 the cost of abortion.

What this is REALLY ABOUT is the FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS.

For every father OR MOTHER in the child support collection system, there are federal matching funds to be had.

The states have a pecuniary interest in keeping families broken.


25 posted on 01/27/2009 9:37:13 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson