Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law

One can divorce their spouse, but not their children and moving on to the second or third wife does not in any way reduce the obligations towards the children by previous spouses or paramours....

I see where you specifically identify “moving on to second or third wife.”

I’m not letting you off the hook on that one. You see it from an evil male standpoint, period.

You are also denying that perhaps, just perhaps, people change. We were married 10 years, and she went off the deep end, for whatever reason.

So, from your point of view, I’m supposed to recognize who a person is going to be in 10 years.

That’s a ridiculous idea, at best.

And, I might also point out that women have all the control when it comes to pregnancy. If a guy wants the kid and the gal doesn’t, she is free to have an abortion. He can do nothing about it.

If he wants nothing to do with the gal or the kid, she’s entitled to his paycheck.


21 posted on 01/27/2009 9:32:17 AM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: stylin_geek

You see it from an evil male standpoint, period.

The above should read “You see at as an evil male event, period.”

Uggh.


22 posted on 01/27/2009 9:33:53 AM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson