Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mobile Vulgus

I get the feeling someone took a photo of King when he was unawares (maybe picking his nose) and he’s feeling a bit irritated.


2 posted on 01/28/2009 6:32:46 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: theDentist

I wonder if Tiger Woods complained about photos of him in action being sold without his approval and now the audible sound is cause for them not to be allowed in the gallery.


5 posted on 01/28/2009 6:34:33 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist
This is a stupid attempt to micromanage the life of us slaves in many ways. First, there are already hundreds of millions of phones out there. Second, it's a feature that will be easy to disable or muffle. Third, there are times when it is legitimate to want to take a picture quietly (say you are hiding in a closet with a cracked door, trying to send a pic to police of an intruder in your home.)

Why not prosecute the actual illegal activities that harm people, instead of trying to micromanage us so we can't do anything that _might_ be bad?

7 posted on 01/28/2009 6:35:16 AM PST by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson