Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calvin Klein ads are banned again (TV Censorship)
The Fashion Time Magazine ^ | Jan 30th, 2009 | The Fashion Time Magazine

Posted on 01/30/2009 11:50:18 AM PST by Mister Ghost

From season to season it happens, and you’re probably not surprised, but Calvin Klein ads are banned again!

The new TV commercial for its Jeans line, shot by the unpredictable and edgy Steven Meisel, turned out to be so provocative, that it was banned from even late-night cable TV.

The new grainy Jeans commercial features half naked models Anna Selezneva, Anna Jagodzinska and Natasha Poly kissing their counterpart male models Vladimir Ivanov and Danny Schwarz. (Image at original site NSFW).

(Excerpt) Read more at thefashiontime.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bannedcommercials; censorship; fashion; liberalagenda; television
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Image at original site NSFW, which is why there is no image with the post.
1 posted on 01/30/2009 11:50:19 AM PST by Mister Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

A typical “Banned in Boston!” style promotion.


2 posted on 01/30/2009 11:54:17 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

Took a quick look, and I mean quick, because it didn’t take long to figure why they were banned.

I would not want my kids to see anything like that, either.


3 posted on 01/30/2009 11:54:19 AM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

Change the channel. Free speech is a good thing. The more power you give the Feds to regulate what’s on the airwaves, the power they will exercise. They don’t see a distinction between ‘decency’ and ‘viewpoint’ so it’s better to have less regulation all the way around if you ask me.


4 posted on 01/30/2009 11:57:33 AM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

Topless waifs kissing gay men.

Tres European!


5 posted on 01/30/2009 11:59:04 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost
What strikes me about those pictures is the sexual ambiguity of both the men and the women.

With homosexual men running almost all the the major fashion houses, I'm not surprised to see artistic images and aesthetics that emote "prepubescent boys" - The women look like teenage boys and the men look like teenage boys.

6 posted on 01/30/2009 12:02:17 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

This isn’t the fed, this is the networks. They don’t have to show stuff they don’t want.


7 posted on 01/30/2009 12:02:35 PM PST by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

They get a thousand times more publicity when something is banned then when they actually have to pay TV stations to run the commercials. best of all it’s free to them. Frankly, I fail to see what the big deal is.


8 posted on 01/30/2009 12:05:03 PM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorboy

The networks aren’t airing it because they are afraid of violating ‘decency standards.’


9 posted on 01/30/2009 12:08:50 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

when your clothes are over priced, poorly made and bland, you have to resort to this kind of stuff to seem current. Calvin Klein is so 1996.


10 posted on 01/30/2009 12:11:26 PM PST by Wonderama Mama (Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost
Step #1 - Film provocative commercial you know won't be aired because of content

Step #2 - Submit it to network

Step #3 - Wait for network to reject it

Step #4 - Complain the network rejected it

Step #5 - Enjoy the publicity

11 posted on 01/30/2009 12:13:01 PM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama Mama

His buttocks are sublime. (Kramer on Seinfeld)


12 posted on 01/30/2009 12:14:08 PM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
The broadcast networks certainly fear the FCC and decency standards, which they should, that's part of the deal when you get an FCC license. The late night cable guys that are refusing aren't afraid of that, they just don't like the ad, which is their prerogative, their network, their time, their ability to say “hell no we ain't showing that”.
13 posted on 01/30/2009 12:14:49 PM PST by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: razorboy

I’m all for self-imposed decency standards...


14 posted on 01/30/2009 12:16:22 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Which this is. Some of the refusers are self imposing due to fear of the government, but most aren’t, and even if fear is a motive it’s still self imposed.


15 posted on 01/30/2009 12:17:47 PM PST by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mister Ghost

it’s no wonder, they’re not selling clothes, they are selling sex


16 posted on 01/30/2009 12:20:27 PM PST by housemouse 1 (continue dumbing down of america)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom

.


17 posted on 01/30/2009 12:20:59 PM PST by RikaStrom (Bitter? Who me? Nah, I'm just clinging to my guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: razorboy
Fear of government retribution is coercion. When it's applied to speech I think it's an unfortunate and illegal thing.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press";

The rule has been subsumed by the exceptions.

18 posted on 01/30/2009 12:23:53 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

these were not going to be aired and they knew it, the controversy is the real ad.


19 posted on 01/30/2009 12:24:46 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Maybe so. Clever.


20 posted on 01/30/2009 12:25:59 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson