Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Notoriously Conservative

I am not a military person, but if a shell explodes on contact with target, and our shells are designed to be launched from a muzzle with 9 MJ of energy, wouldn’t multiplying the muzzle energy by 5 have a risk of making the shell think it is experiencing impact when it is being launched from a rail gun? I am sure they will design new shells, but it seems like we may be approaching some kind of physiscal limit here.


9 posted on 02/10/2009 7:59:28 AM PST by Nomen Klatura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nomen Klatura

“I am not a military person, but if a shell explodes on contact with target, and our shells are designed to be launched from a muzzle with 9 MJ of energy, wouldn’t multiplying the muzzle energy by 5 have a risk of making the shell think it is experiencing impact when it is being launched from a rail gun?”

The projectiles are inert, meaning they carry no explosive. The destructive effect is strictly from kinetic energy.

One big advantage of this is that gun magazines (where the shells are stored) will no longer explode violently if hit in battle.


19 posted on 02/10/2009 8:09:39 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Nomen Klatura

It’s not an explosive warhead. It relies on kinetic energy.

If you think that this weapon is interesting, Google for “rods from God” which is an older and, I think, more interesting concept.


23 posted on 02/10/2009 8:18:32 AM PST by Comstock1 (If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry .45 caliber miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson