The Chance for a New World Order

Harold Tribune ^ | 2/10/09 | Henry Kissinger

[FromLori]

As the new U.S. administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international crises, it may seem counterintuitive to argue that the very unsettled nature of the international system generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy.

That opportunity involves a seeming contradiction. On one level, the financial collapse represents a major blow to the standing of the United States. While American political judgments have often proved controversial, the American prescription for a world financial order has generally been unchallenged. Now disillusionment with the United States' management of it is widespread.

At the same time, the magnitude of the debacle makes it impossible for the rest of the world to shelter any longer behind American predominance or American failings.

[FromLori]

hmmm how long have they been planning this?

Clinton, Quigley, and the New World Order 27Jan09 I've been doing a lot of research lately, and I recently came across this little-known quote while reading through Bill Clinton's book My Life. In Chapter 24, he writes:

"I ended 1987 with my third speech of the decade at the Florida Democratic convention…

I told the Florida Democrats, "We have to do nothing less than create a new world economic order and secure the place of the American people within it." The central arguments I made were "We've got to pay the price today to secure tomorrow" and "We're all in it together."

In retrospect, my speeches in the late eighties seem interesting to me because of their similarity to what I would say in 1992 and what I tried to do as President."

Recall that Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. Recall also that one of Clinton's professors at Georgetown was Carroll Quigley, and that he has quoted Quigley and payed homage to him as a mentor many times in his speeches, including his 1992 nomination acceptance speech. In My Life he discusses the "lasting impact" that Quigleys "insights" had on him. On page ix of The Anglo-American Establishment, Quigley writes:

"The Rhodes scholarship established by the terms of Cecil Rhodes' seventh will are known to everyone. What is not so widely known is that Rhodes, in five previous wills, left his fortune to form a secret society, which was to devote itself to the preservation and expansion of the British Empire. And what does not seem to be known to anyone is that this secret society … continues to exist to this day. To be sure, [it] is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members know each other intimately. It probably has no oaths of secrecy nor any formal procedure of initiation. It does, however, exist and holds secret meetings…. This Group is, as I shall show, one of the most important historical facts of the twentieth century."

And what were the goals of this "group"? According to Quigley (Tragedy and Hope, pg. 324):

"…nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and he economy of the world as a whole. The system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basil, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank …sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world"

And how does he know that? Two pages later he writes:

"I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years during the 1960's to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have for much of my life been close to it and to many of its instruments. In general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown."

This is merely the tip of the iceberg. If you really want to understand the relevance of this quote by Clinton, I highly recommending reading the five part series entitled The Future Is Calling by G. Edward Griffin. All of these Quigley quotes can be found in part two, entitled Secret Societies and Hidden Agendas (though you will benefit greatly if you start with part one.)

Also, read The Trilateral Commission: Usurping Sovereignty by Patrick Wood. Bill Clinton is a member of the Trilateral Commission, which– as you will learn if you don't already know– was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski with the explicit goal of creating the "new world economic order" that Clinton is talking about. The creation of this new world order, according to the Trilateral Commission's own writings, means "working against the best interest of the United States"[1] to accomplish an "end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece"[2], which will eventually give way to a one world collectivist government run by them from behind the scenes.

Senator Barry Goldwater tried to warn us about this thirty years ago. In his book With No Apologies (1979), he wrote:

"Where I differ from [then Governor Nelson Rockefeller] is in the suggestion implicit throughout his [1962 lectures at Harvard University] that… the United States must submerge its national identity and surrender substantial matters of sovereignty to a new political order. The implications in Governor Rockefeller's presentation have become concrete proposals advanced by David Rockefeller's newest international cabal, the Trilateral Commission. Whereas the Council on Foreign Relations is distinctly national in membership, the Trilateral Commission is international… It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller screened and selected every individual who was invited to participate in shaping and administering the proposed new world order." (pg 293)

"What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the national-states involved… As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future." " (pg. 299)

See also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSQFySxzznw

[1] Trilateral Commission founder David Rockefeller, in his book "Memoirs", pg. 405. He also openly says that he is part of a "secret cabal" that is "conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will" [2] Trilateral Commissioner Richard Gardner, "The Hard Road to World Order", Foreign Affairs, April 1974, pg. 558

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FromLori]

JFK SPEECH ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING BAN AND WORLD PEACE
A Harrowing speech from JFK to the UN assembly, on the introduction of the limited test ban treaty, it lasted a while, A great speech, not once do you hear him mention New World Order. John Fitzgerald Kennedy (May 29, 1917—November 22, 1963), was the thirty-fifth President of the United States, serving from 1961 until his assassination in 1963. After Kennedy’s leadership as commander of the USS PT-109 during World War II in the South Pacific, his aspirations turned political. Kennedy represented the state of Massachusetts in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1947 to 1953 as a Democrat, and in the U.S. Senate from 1953 until 1961. Kennedy defeated former Vice President and Republican candidate Richard Nixon in the 1960 U.S. presidential election, one of the closest in American...
Tags: ATOMIC, BOMB, COLD, COMMUNIST, crises, Cuban, JFK, missle, NUCLEAR, NUKES, PRESIDENT, SOVIET, SPEECH, TESTING, WAR, WEAPONS

http://www.1913intel.com/2009/02/09/nuclear-warheads-and-reductions/

[Frantzie]

Kissenger needs to join Teddy in a dirt nap.

[RegulatorCountry]

Hi, Harold. Didn’t know you had a tribune. International, even.

Jolly good.

[worst-case scenario]

Yes, I too was wondering - who is this “Harold Tribune”? And he got Kissinger to write for him!

[Force of Truth]

Global communism is just down the pike, we already have socialism here in the most powerful nation on earth.

[Texas Fossil]

Never understood why Nixon selected Kissinger!

I never trusted him, and have no clue why Tricky Dick did.

If he did?

[blueplum]

well, I think Kissinger is summing up the stage that has been set for us - complete with an ultimatum. The EU by itself didn't work. It must, therefore, be larger and must be in elitist hands. The question of the day is, has the process already been pushed beyond our control? imo jmo moo

"The nadir of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world and been made globally accessible via instantaneous communication. The alternative to a new international order is chaos."

[Wonder Warthog]

"Kissenger needs to join Teddy in a dirt nap."

I keep wonder when Kissinger is finally going to kick off. The man seems longer-lived than Methuselah.

[Just mythoughts]

well, I think Kissinger is summing up the stage that has been set for us - complete with an ultimatum. The EU by itself didn't work. It must, therefore, be larger and must be in elitist hands. The question of the day is, has the process already been pushed beyond our control? imo jmo moo

Maybe... maybe not... depends if the toddler in chief decides he has a brain and starts doing stuff on his own.

[calcowgirl]

The ultimate challenge is to shape the common concern of most countries and all major ones regarding the economic crisis, together with a common fear of jihadist terrorism, into a common strategy reinforced by the realization that the new issues like proliferation, energy and climate change permit no national or regional solution.

The whole thing is a gagger, but I didn't expect him to throw in global warming to prop up his anti-American whacked out views.

[RegulatorCountry]

Harold moves in very influential circles.

[Frantzie]

Yeah the EU failed because it was not big enough and only marxist-lite. WE need to make it bigger so it will succeed.

[calcowgirl]

Kissinger has been busy with this (click on keyword NWO and it’s all Kissinger, all the time)

Here is one from an earlier thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2162175/posts

Kissinger, never one to let a crisis got to waste, has been busy on an important new-world-order project in Russia with Vladimir Putin. Although it has gone virtually unreported in the U.S. media, Kissinger has been featured prominently in the Russian media during his many trips over the past decade to Moscow to meet with Putin and Yevgeny Primakov, the former KGB terror master for the Soviet Union in the Middle East. In 2007, Kissinger and Primakov were appointed by Putin to co-chair a bilateral “working group” of Russian and American political insiders to tackle issues such as global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and nuclear threats.

...

[pallis]

Meet the new world order, worse than the old one, and all the screwballs can’t wait to get it.

[kenavi]

"In general, I agree with the goals and aims of the Milner Group. I feel that the British way of life and the British Commonwealth of Nations are among the great achievements of all history. I feel that the destruction of either of them would be a terrible disaster to mankind. I feel that the withdrawal of Ireland, of Burma, of India, or of Palestine from the Commonwealth is regrettable and attributable to the fact that the persons in control of these areas failed to absorb the British way of life while they were parts of the Commonwealth. I suppose, in the long view, my attitude would not be far different from that of the members of the Milner Group. But, agreeing with the Group on goals, I cannot agree with them on methods. To be sure, I realize that some of their methods were based on nothing but good intentions and high ideals—higher ideals than mine, perhaps. But their lack of perspective in critical moments, their failure to use intelligence and common sense, their tendency to fall back on standardized social reactions and verbal cliches in a crisis, their tendency to place power and influence into hands chosen by friendship rather than merit, their oblivion to the consequences of their actions, their ignorance of the point of view of persons in other countries or of persons in other classes in their own country—these things, it seems to me, have brought many of the things which they and I hold dear close to disaster. In this Group were persons like Esher, Grey, Milner, Hankey, and Zimmern, who must command the admiration and affection of all who know of them. On the other hand, in this Group were persons whose lives have been a disaster to our way of life. Unfortunately, in the long run, both in the Group and in the world, the influence of the latter kind has been stronger than the influence of the former."

They lost.

[CowboyJay]

hmmm how long have they been planning this?

Roughly 100 years, but I'm sure you knew that already. The last obstacle in their path was a well armed, industrialized, nationalist US of A. We've been socialist for a long, long time. It took them alot longer to kick the nationalism out of us. They've finally fractured and triangulated us to the point that they figure we don't have enough unity left to put up a fight.

[FromLori]

YES I did this economic crisis is just what they needed and created to force us into it and when it comes down to brass tacks the only real difference between Socialism/Communism/Marxism/fascism is who is doing the controlling they are all Totalitarian. Have you read this?

---

http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/new-labourbehind-the-mask-they-wearfabians/