Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sadiebella

—and this small “l” libertarian agrees, also—and also suspects that there was less of a “drug problem” in 1880 with no prohibition, than there is now-—


26 posted on 02/11/2009 2:46:23 PM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank
...and also suspects that there was less of a "drug problem" in 1880 with no prohibition, than there is now

According to figures at the USDOJ website, addiction to cocaine and opiates was actually higher in 2000 than in 1900.

"By 1900, about one American in 200 was either a cocaine or opium addict."

--http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/demand/speakout/06so.htm

_______________________________________

"Among those using cocaine in the United States during 2000, 3.6 million were hardcore users who spent more than $36 billion on the drug in that year."

--http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs07/794/cocaine.htm

______________________________________

"There were an estimated 980,000 hardcore heroin addicts in the United States in 1999, 50 percent more than the estimated 630,000 hardcore addicts in 1992."

--http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs07/794/heroin.htm

______________________________________

The US population in 2000 was about 280,000,000. So using those figures, the combined addiction rate was about 1.6% in 2000 vs 0.5% in 1900.

59 posted on 02/11/2009 8:46:35 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson