Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WayneS

No, by saying “I, for one, did not ‘vanish’” you could be understood to be contrasting yourself with those who supposedly *did* vanish.

That is a tacit acceptance of his duplicitous premise.


26 posted on 02/24/2009 9:05:30 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
That is a tacit acceptance of his duplicitous premise...

No, it is not.

It is OVERT acceptance of the fact that I am only able to speak for myself, and not for others.

PLEASE - Feel free to speak for YOURSELF; but do NOT accuse me of saying, thinking, or doing something that I was NOT saying, thinking or doing.

27 posted on 02/24/2009 9:13:08 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson