Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SpaceBar

Really. Headline is definitely misleading.


10 posted on 03/08/2009 4:10:50 PM PDT by edpc (01010111 01010100 01000110 00111111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: edpc

Perhaps not. Perhaps Mexico has no legal definition of “martial law” as does the United States.

Here’s the Wikipedia definition, which seems reasonably accurate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law

“Martial law is the system of rules that takes effect when the military takes control of the normal administration of justice.”

One could argue that is precisely what is now happening in Ciudad Juarz. They just don’t call it that.


13 posted on 03/08/2009 4:15:18 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: edpc; SpaceBar

-———Headline is definitely misleading.-—————

Are you sure about that? The reporter seemed to be trying to make it clear that “what we in america would call martial law” as if that’s not what it is called down in mexico.

There are a few other stories contained at post 1. Al-Reuters is reporting that “Mexico army to take over policing in drug-hit city”.

Instead of searching for mexico martial law, search for juarez military


15 posted on 03/08/2009 4:18:00 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing (The media are WINOs - Watchdogs in name only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson