Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Personally, I think this moron should go eat lamb poo!

follow up

Real "Kitchen Nightmare": Chef Gordon Ramsay's Hypocritical Statism

By Debbie Schlussel

Meet the Nanny Chef, Gordon Ramsay, the anti-carbon print kitchenmaster.

Personally, I don't like British Chef Ramsay's two successful FOX reality shows, "Hell's Kitchen" and "Kitchen Nightmares." He's overly abusive with his quick temper, and takes the Simon Cowell schtick too far.

But what I really don't like is how he's now trying to use government power to impose his idiosyncracies and politics on other chefs. Oh, and he doesn't practice what he's trying to get government to do to his kitchen colleagues across Britain Ramsay wants the British government to fine chefs who don't use his politically correct choice of produce and ingredients--so-called "local ingredients." It's the latest rage across America, too: You're supposed to help your community and reduce the carbon footprint (in terms of packaging and delivery fuel costs to import the food) by only buying local ingredients and only when they're in season.

Yet, while Ramsay wants others to do this, he himself doesn't practice what he preaches. And that's in addition to his nanny state approaches results--putting poor farmers in the Third World out of business. I'm all for buying American and supporting your local economy, and I try to buy products made and ingredients produced in America to support our economy. But that's a choice, and that's the way it should be--not a government mandate. What Ramsay is trying to do in British kitchens and haute cuisine is haute statism:

Britain's most-decorated chef - he has been awarded 12 Michelin stars - demanded the Government outlaw all out-of-season food from every restaurant in Britain. By making his comments, the chef, author and television presenter was laying down a marker of his personal food philosophy. But he also risked accusations of hypocrisy because he fails quite brazenly to practise what he preaches in his own restaurants, which serve food from thousands of miles away.

Making a call for legislation on Radio 5 Live, Ramsay said: "There should be stringent laws - licensing laws - to make sure produce is only used in season.

"The quicker we get legislation pushed through the Houses of Parliament, the more unique this country will become in terms of its sourcing and level of inspiration. Chefs should be fined if they haven't got ingredients in season on the menu."

Again, at Ramsay's restaurants all over the world (including in New York and the Mid-East), he regularly imports ingredients from all over the world. Do as Chef Ramsay says, not as he does.

And it's interesting that Ramsay is concerned with the carbon footprint when--to film his two reality shows in America--he constantly flies himself and production staff all over America, and then constantly flies back home to Britain. That's a lot of fuel wasted, more than was used to make your non-local-ingredients gourmet meal.

Hmmm . . . I think we see what the real "Hell's Kitchen" looks like. It's not the one hosted by Ramsay on FOX. It's the one hosted by Ramsay and the British Government in the UK.

Time to deport this alien chef away from America's kitchens. Gordon Ramsay's politics and hypocritical statist goals are a recipe for disaster. Keep them off America's menu.

Exit question: What's the carbon footprint for production, sale, and delivery of these many Gordon Ramsay products?

Hard to say, but it surely rivals the cash footprint left in Ramsay's bank account. That's the only real green Chef Ramsay really cares about.


1 posted on 03/19/2009 11:07:15 AM PDT by mainestategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


So who gets to decide what is or what is not healthy? How the hell are these idiots going to decide? I remember growing up government told us to eat low fat high carbohydrates, well that didn’t work! Obesity went up big time! What the hell makes this idiot think that its going to help again!?


2 posted on 03/19/2009 11:08:43 AM PDT by mainestategop (MAINE: The way communism should be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

that idiot has spent too much of his “life” bossing little girls around in the kitchen...


3 posted on 03/19/2009 11:10:05 AM PDT by jessduntno ( www.SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

I’m genuinely surprised no one hasn’t buried a knife in this guy.


4 posted on 03/19/2009 11:11:45 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop
If something like this were to pass, I'm turning my parents in. That’ll learn ‘em to go to Hawaii without me.
5 posted on 03/19/2009 11:12:12 AM PDT by txroadkill (God Help Us-The Rats are in charge! And they aren't paying their taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

I don’t care WHO he is, if he talked/acted towards ME the way he does towards his hapless victims/contestants on his “reality” show, he’d be swallowing some or all of his teeth.

Regarding his idea of “punishing parents of obese children” he should be told to go pi$$ up a rope, and mind his own business, before someone seriously HURTS him.

All in all, he appears to be one serious waste of human flesh.


7 posted on 03/19/2009 11:14:15 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

I have been in the food industry for years. I have worked with too many Gordon Ramsays in my day. Loud mouth bullies pretending to be chefs.

Where does a Brit get off telling anyone about fine cuisine? From the country that gave the world kidney pie and bangers and mash.


8 posted on 03/19/2009 11:14:29 AM PDT by John 3_19-21 ('Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

Ramsay’s ego knows no bounds. You’re a chef Ramsay. You cook food. The self-importance of a jerk like this is really intolerable. I wonder how often he mouths off the the wrong guy and gets his butt kicked.


10 posted on 03/19/2009 11:15:54 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

This would make a certain amount of sense if the government wsn’t simultaneously forcing children into government-run schools, where parents have no control over what the children eat all day. If they’d get the food supply in the schools under control, including prohibiting children from sharing food brought from home with other children, then I think it would be perfectly appropriate to cut off the government health care benefits of the parents. You can’t have the parents actively racking up a replacement generation who will be outrageously expensive for the NHS (which shouldn’t exist, but it does), and not “charge” them for this action.

It’s a big problem in the US too, where much of the country is on some sort of taxpayer-funded healthcare program, and private insurance is so heavily regulated that it’s not allowed to refuse or cancel policies for people who are obese. People who live responsibly, taking proper care of their own health and their children’s health, end up getting stuck with the huge bill for those who don’t.


12 posted on 03/19/2009 11:16:32 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

If food is bad, he’s a pusher.


13 posted on 03/19/2009 11:18:07 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New Obama Mantra, "Screw World Peace, I'll Buy You A Pony.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop; PigRigger
Here's an idea...Increase Fat people/Fat children..their family property taxes. The Gov't taxes smokers higher to make them quit smoking. Maybe if you tax fat people and their fat children they may eat less? Please, don't tell me it is wrong...Fat people cost more health wise in this country then people who smoke... Why are smokers subject to a sin tax rather then fat people...Before anyone has a cow, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.
14 posted on 03/19/2009 11:19:01 AM PDT by never4get (We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop
In addition to the health risks associated with obesity, Ramsay said heftier children also endure psychological suffering at the hands of other youth.

And being a nib-nosed, statist, anti-liberty zealot could subject him to being kicked in the ass by people who are smart enough to decide that they'll have none of what he's selling.

19 posted on 03/19/2009 11:27:02 AM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

The carbon footprint nonsense set aside, Gordon Ramsey is just parroting Chef Marco Pierre White’s mantra about locally produced foods. And it’s having an effect in Britain especially after Marco hosted Hell’s Kitchen and the Great British Feast. The Restaurant’s focus, also on locally produced products, has spread it to yet another audience. Local producers (and employees) are feeling the impact of these changes, and they’re finding customers for their products instead of going out of business.

Anyway, back to the topic of the post: Holding parents accountable for their children is admirable, but it should be the community, not the arm of government, which does it. Only the common man doesn’t know if they can do that anymore - after all, isn’t it a hate crime to demand parents care for their children?

The nanny state expands..


20 posted on 03/19/2009 11:31:47 AM PDT by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

The only reason to watch his show is to see if somebody finally gives him a meat cleaver to the head.


22 posted on 03/19/2009 11:52:11 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

Like actors should just shut up and act, chefs should just shut up and COOK!


23 posted on 03/19/2009 11:53:16 AM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

*


25 posted on 03/19/2009 12:47:54 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

“putting poor farmers in the Third World out of business.” Whoahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.


26 posted on 03/19/2009 12:54:43 PM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

Hey Gordon, lets play my game first. You get punched in the mouth if you say something stupid. Now...close your eyes!


27 posted on 03/19/2009 1:31:25 PM PDT by highnoon (How can the gov't run healthcare when they can't even handle the mail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop

I’ve always liked Gordon Ramsay (especially “Kitchen Nightmares”) but that’s a huge load ‘o crap.


28 posted on 03/19/2009 6:40:38 PM PDT by Kellykoop (All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mainestategop
The idea that the state should get involved with this is ludicrous. However, a real problem exists:

A child brought up to be obese will - over a lifetime - cost health care providers about as much as an AIDS patient (again, over a lifespan). That is serious dinero (diabetes meds, heart disease, surgery etc.), which other people do have to work for.
29 posted on 03/20/2009 6:51:28 AM PDT by wolf78 (Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson