Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama supports an international treaty creating sweeping gun control efforts.
CNN ^ | CNN

Posted on 05/02/2009 6:05:58 AM PDT by xmission

Video


TOPICS: Government; Outdoors; Society
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; bho44; bhofascism; bhotreason; bhotyranny; cwii; democrats; donttreadonme; guns; lping; obama; rapeofliberty; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Even CNN knows it.
1 posted on 05/02/2009 6:05:59 AM PDT by xmission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xmission

Letting the UN take away our Second Amendment right to bear arms will give Democrat politicians cover as well, so they can stand for re-election and claim they had nothing to do with registration and ultimate confiscation of fire arms owned by citizens. And we thought Clintoon was slick....


2 posted on 05/02/2009 6:10:29 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

You know, I never thought of it that way...


3 posted on 05/02/2009 6:12:17 AM PDT by xmission (www.iwilldefendtheconstitution.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Call for REFORM in 2010 - 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 05/02/2009 6:19:20 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

No treaty like this would ever be ratified by congress. They love their perks and power too much.


5 posted on 05/02/2009 6:21:43 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xmission

This is the Back Door “International Treaties Trump Local Law in America” .... I’d like to see BHO explain how My Gun in Texas causes International problems.....Unless China wants us un-armed when they invade.

Obama lets the Cat out of the Bag on this one.....He cannot explain this except in terms of “you lose 2nd ammendment rights”....His Popularity is gonna sink like a Heavy Metal Rock.

This pursuit VIOLATES OBAMA’s OATH TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION.
We ain’t that Stupid Bambi....you are.


6 posted on 05/02/2009 6:23:03 AM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Hopefully, this is true. We STILL need complete reform in the next elections! ;-)


7 posted on 05/02/2009 6:23:28 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Smells like treason to me....


8 posted on 05/02/2009 6:26:57 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

“No treaty like this would ever be ratified by congress.”

Normally I would agree, but if we have a “number” of resignations from the Supreme Court which Obozo replaces. Packing the court, and the Senate ratifies the treaty that Clinton signed, with Specter’s defection and Franken seated it could happen. Takes 2/3 vote to do it.

Actions have consequences. Zero had best gaze into the abyss and think hard about what he is doing. It is time to blink, but he may not.

Many will not go quietly under the yoke.

Go to Google and type in 223 in the search and look at the hits.


9 posted on 05/02/2009 6:29:00 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed

With the exception of one or two, ALL of our politicians violate their oath to the constitution all of the time.

I’m afraid we need a complete reset in order for this country to survive. There is no way that we can undo what has been done without compromise.


10 posted on 05/02/2009 6:29:39 AM PDT by xmission (www.iwilldefendtheconstitution.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Avoid the hysterical nonsense.


11 posted on 05/02/2009 6:31:31 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

You nailed it.

It makes sense. He defers to the U.N. on other issues.

What an SOB.


12 posted on 05/02/2009 6:34:17 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xmission
The NRA has already fought and won this fight a couple of years ago when John Bolton was our U.N. Ambassador. The NRA is a Non Government Organization[NGO].

But since there are so many Freepers who won't join the NRA because they might get a letter in the mail and can't get their lazy fat asses off the couch, we are pretty much screwed.

13 posted on 05/02/2009 7:07:52 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Rumor has it this sort of thing has been going on for decades.

ONE BULLET AT A TIME
THAT’S HOW YOU’LL GET OUR GUNS

Ready to be Disarmed?
From: NamVet 049 Over the weekend I went to a pro-gun, pro civil rights rally in Niagara Falls sponsored by S.C.O.P.E. In their monthly paper was the following article. This is real scary and should be checked and gotten a response to, from our elected officials...
If someday your children or grand-children ask you how Liberty died in America and what happened that caused the demise of the Nation, read this and you will be able to answer them.
If they ask you why the Citizens have been disarmed, you’ll know.
If you want to know why, go to your local library, no matter where you live in the US. Tell the librarian to show you where the “United States Code books” are shelved. There are 25 books in the set. They are reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC. These hard-covered books are printed every 8-10 years. They are updated with annual soft-back supplements each year until a new hardcover issue comes out. At the present time, the 1988 hardbacks are on library shelves.
OPEN VOLUME 9. The page num-bers are in the center near the middle binding. The section numbers are along the edges.
TURN TO PAGE 651. Here you will find Public Law 87-297 which calls for the US to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the US in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve, which is why they want to take away your firearms. {this is title 22 USC section 2551].
TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by “disarmament.” The dis-armament calls for the elimination of our armed forces. It also calls for the elimina-tion of weapons of all kinds. {This is title 22 USC 2552(a)}.
TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as Item (a) “control, reduc-tion and elimination of armed forces ...” and as Item (d) “...elimination of armed forces ...” What you need to know is that your armed forces are being eliminated and relinquished from National control which, in turn, wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In two stages, we will have no more army, no more navy, no more air force. In the third stage, we shall have a “zero” military. Before Stage I closes, all citizen-owned guns are to be banned. {This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a)}.
Public Law 87-297 is further ex-plained in the State Department Docu-ment called Publication 7277. Your li-brarian can also furnish you a copy. Also ask the librarian to get you a copy of “The Blue Print for the Peace Race.” It is a 35-page booklet printed by the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency as Publication No. 4 -General Series 3 - Released May of 1962. Publication No. 4 is the unabridged version of State De-partment Document 7277.
Both of these booklets explain how our military is to be reduced to 2.1 mil-lion men. China and the Soviets are to be reduced to that level also. At this point, we are at Stage I at which time we are to transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of our armed forces to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies. In Stage II, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is then turned over to this same Security Council of the United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian. the world’s smaller nations turn 100% of their armies over to the same undersecretary of the Security Council in Stage II. President George Bush and Admiral William J. Crowe [have re-ferred] to this process as being “in transi-tion.”
TURN TO PAGE 655. On this page in Volume 9 of the US code, read “Policy Formation.” The directives there (written in 1963 to pacify objectors) are supposedly to restrain anyone from disarmament, reducing or limiting our arma-ments, or taking guns away from the people unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the president, or if it is authorized by further legislation by the Congress. {This is Title 22, Section 2573}.
Every couple of years, the House of Representatives votes to appropriate funds for this ongoing program. Since P.L. 87-297 was first passed into law in 1961, there have been 18 updates to it - all bad - with no deletions of these issues that I lay before you now. the Congress knows that the plan includes the policing of the US by foreign troops. {The world army they are forming in Europe.} The congress is allowing our military bases to be closed down, except for those that will be used by the world army. You will find that plan in Publication 7277 and in “The Blueprint for the Peace Race.”
If the president and congress can promote a “Constitutional Convention” you will find yourself with two new constitutions (communist in structure) which in one states in Article VIII, Section 12: “No person shall bear arms or possess le-thal weapons except the police and members of the armed forces ...” The Congress has praised these documents and is on record in Senate hearings seeking ways to install these constitutions. Ask your librarian for “Revision of the United Nations Charter – Hearings Before a Sub-committee {Foreign Relations} Feb. 2-20, 1950 U.S. Government Printing Office.” Nothing has changed since. They are still viable.
The ultimate goal to be reached, in Stage III of the disarmament process, is to “proceed to a point where no state [na-tion] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force ...”
Anyone who doubts the truthfulness of what has been presented here is free to go to the library and go through the steps which have been outlined above. While you are at it, look up Public Law 101-216.
State Department Publication 7277 is available on the web at:
http://www.kobres.com/disarm.html and in electronic form as file PUB 7277.ZIP on at least the following bulletin boards:
Paul Revere - San Jose (408) 947-7800
The Rising Storm (408) 739-8693.
If in future years your children or grandchildren ask why you allowed their freedom to slip through your fingers, no one who has read this material will be able to say: “If only I had known.” Now that you have read this, you know.


14 posted on 05/02/2009 7:16:50 AM PDT by Califreak ("Could Zero be the Walkin' Dude?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
15 posted on 05/02/2009 7:18:58 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xmission

International authorities had better be wearing some very sturdy international body armour during their weapons collection trek up my driveway. Just a suggestion for our international friends and neighbors.


16 posted on 05/02/2009 7:37:23 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Blue helmets make fine targets.


17 posted on 05/02/2009 7:54:43 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Blue helmets make fine targets.


18 posted on 05/02/2009 7:54:43 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

OOPS!


19 posted on 05/02/2009 7:55:09 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Obama has talked about increasing the size of the Supreme Court to 11 justices.


20 posted on 05/02/2009 8:57:35 AM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson