Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Electric Graffiti

” If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year.”

The “Original” birth certificate that “O” posted on his campaign site had “Date filed by Registrar” as August 8, 1961, so I wouldn’t see how he could get by with going over as an adult to create what was supposedly in existence in 1961.


19 posted on 05/12/2009 12:14:35 PM PDT by rreahsito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: rreahsito

I do, however, think they will trial float whatever scam they are going to try on venues such as FR, just to see what kind of holes people will poke in it.

Oooops gotta go, black caddy in front of the house.


20 posted on 05/12/2009 12:16:43 PM PDT by rreahsito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: rreahsito

True.....But you never know with this scumbag. That’s why Polarik’s tag line reads “forgeries are forever”


24 posted on 05/12/2009 12:20:42 PM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: rreahsito
The “Original” birth certificate that “O” posted on his campaign site had “Date filed by Registrar” as August 8, 1961, so I wouldn’t see how he could get by with going over as an adult to create what was supposedly in existence in 1961.

If it is a "delayed" or "unattended" type certificate, then it's possible that he was born earlier, maybe not too much earlier, than the certificate says. Also possibly not where the certificate says. If his original certificate shows his grandmother as witness, rather than an attending physician or midwife, and birth in someplace other than a hospital, that would be somewhat suspecious. His mother and grandmother would not have falsified the application so that he could be natural born, and eligible to the office of President, but rather so he could be a citizen at all, since IF he was born outside the country and IF his father was not a citizen (which he was not IF he was Barack H. Obama Sr.) then he was not a citizen at birth, provided his parents were married, since his mother did not then meet the criteria for passing on US citizenship to her offspring. (She did by the time his half sister was born) In 1961, even left wing types still saw advantages to being an American citizen.

68 posted on 05/12/2009 4:10:32 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: rreahsito
>>>so I wouldn’t see how he could get by with going over as an adult to create what was supposedly in existence in 1961.

----------------------

....could be issued upon testimony of an adult including the subject person

It doesn't say it had to be him. Just an adult.

74 posted on 05/12/2009 5:05:52 PM PDT by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson