My objection to O’Reilly has nothing to do with being a purist. It has to do with him lying about this community so he could look “fair & balanced” by balancing out his accurate criticism of the crazies at Kos and HuffPo with false charges of racism aimed at us.
A purist is a person who ditches Dick Cheney over gay marriage. A Freeper who dismisses BO is merely someone with their eyes open. I’m glad he’s on the right side of the Tiller and Megan’s Law issues, but he’s a lying hack.
posted on 06/01/2009 5:42:01 PM PDT
by Mr. Silverback
(We're definitely in the Rise of the Empire era, but is Obama Valorum or Palpatine?)
To: Mr. Silverback
He is also on the right side of believing that the fence between Mex and us is needed and helpful. Also, BO says he himself doesn't do much on the computer. He probably was relying on bad info from his staff. Also, he may have been alerted to some of the negative comments about him that have been going on for a long time on FR (often true comments). If his staff has shown him many comments that oppose him from FR it might be understandable why he doesn't like us. For the record BO is not my favorite. I often get upset with him too. He has been, on the whole, better lately, though. During the campaign he was far, far too obliging to Obama, once again being naive, thinking that Obama is very intelligent and a basically a good guy.
posted on 06/01/2009 8:33:39 PM PDT
(The end of this age is near but the beginning of the next glorious one is coming!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson