“Transparency” was a nifty buzzword during the campaign.
Like all the others uttered by this POS, totally devoid of any meaning.
Press Corp to Obama White House: Oh, OK. Was that a designer dress beautiful Michelle was wearing so elegantly? Wow, look at the shiny thing!
bttt
If he had buisness in new york and stayed there the weekend this would be less offensive.
These people who protect the president are workinig on-call 24/7 anyway, so the cost is there whether he stays home or not.
Well, then, it's OK for his critics to pull any number out of the air and claim that's what it cost the taxpayer. When screams of "It's a LIE!" are made, remind the screamee that Obama decided to hide the costs, so unless he comes clean, the figure is a Best Estimate.
Freedom of Information Act anyone?
1) Must be able to read from a teleprompter.
2) Must be willing to fly around the world and talk (see item #1)
3) Experience in spending other peoples $$$ is highly desirable.
4) Ability to strike a pose for the camera is a plus.
I pick the cost at $500K. They wont release the numbers, my number is as good as anyones.
You mean someone in the press actually ASKED that question?!?!?! No way!
In these economic times, the cost would have been equal some 1,000 workers’ annual income.
Just like their first date....It wasn't the Museum meet "Date"....It was the show they went to see that night.
To be fair, if President Bush (either one) had done the same with the missus, I would not have complained. So I won’t complain about Obama on this matter.
Now on about a hundred other things....
Obama decimated General Aviation with his demonization of corporate aircraft, then he turns around and uses three corporate jets.
Published on SavannahNow.com (http://savannahnow.com)
No plane, no gain
By Savannah Morning News
Created 2009-06-06 23:30
COMMERCIAL AIRLINES serve about 500 airports in this country. Privately owned aircraft can land at 5,000 airports.
Do the math.
For companies with executives who must travel to many different cities, flying by corporate jet makes more sense than flying commercial in terms of time, expense and productivity. While some people may harbor images of egocentric fat cats flitting across the skies and wasting money, they are falling for inaccurate stereotypes.
The truth of the matter is that these private aircraft aren’t symbols of excess and arrogance. They’re business tools.
Contrary to popular perception, the private aviation industry reports that 85 percent of business jet/general aviation passengers aren’t CEOs. Instead, they are sales, marketing and financial people. They are people who work in technical fields, the government, the military and humanitarian organizations. They are travelers who often go to small cities and towns that are many miles from the nearest big airport.
Ever wonder how extremely perishable donor organs get from one side of the country to another? (Hint: The handlers don’t check their precious cargo at the ticket counter or with a skycap.)
Properly used, corporate aircraft like those manufactured and maintained by Savannah-based Gulfstream can keep a company healthy and competitive. They keep Americans on the job. These days, any edge is important.
Unfortunately, Gulfstream and its 6,000-plus employees here and in Brunswick have been paying an unfair price because some public figures have demonized an entire industry, all because of the selfish actions of a few. Even President Obama, while properly excoriating a handful of big shots who claimed bonuses while their companies got public bailout money, piled on by painting business jets as extravagant perks.
Mr. Obama got it wrong. So did some members of Congress.
They forget that about 1.2 million people are employed in this industry nationwide. They forget that the industry’s annual $150 billion output ripples through communities, supporting hosts of local businesses and key social service organizations like the United Way.
Indeed, in the state of Georgia alone, the 2008 financial impact of Gulfstream and the Savannah Air Center was a whopping $737 million.
Everyone seems to remember when the Big Three auto execs flew by private jet to Washington last year to testify before Congress. But fewer people know that just last month, the mayors of 70 small and medium-sized cities wrote Mr. Obama, urging him to help change “toxic perceptions” about business jet travel that put their local economies at risk.
CBS News reported last month about a Caterpillar tractor dealer who flies his customers by private jet to assembly plants. That’s because he must travel to remote places. Such business owners, along with city leaders who wrote the president, know that such travel isn’t a matter of fun. It’s a crucial lifeline to rural and small-town America.
Yes, flying by business jet may cost more than flying coach. And you can’t defend wasteful joyriding by a few. But when you factor in the cost of sending multiple, high-paid people to multiple places over multiple days, the money saved in terms of efficiency begins to add up.
A loose travel itinerary may be fine for a holiday trip to grandma’s house. But it isn’t always fine for a business with thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in payroll on the line.
Gulfstream is laying off 1,200 workers company-wide because of a slump in sales. Some 1,500 employees will be furloughed for five weeks beginning in July. But unlike the ailing U.S. auto industry, the general aviation industry’s worst wounds weren’t self-inflicted. They were largely perpetrated by others.
Fortunately, this industry is resilient. Gulfstream, which is known for quality, can and should come back, especially as credit loosens, the inventory in available aircraft on the market is whittled down and more politicians come to their senses.