Posted on 06/10/2009 3:07:18 PM PDT by blackrobe
The answer to one of the above questions is absolutely, YES! --Either Barack Hussein Obama is guilty of treason, as formally charged in a March 2009 federal criminal complaint filed by retired Navy LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, on March 17th, (or) LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick is indeed guilty of Mutiny, - “forcible or passive resistance to lawful authority; especially: concerted revolt (as of a naval crew) against discipline or a superior officer.”
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
I regret all the nasty things I said about Canada including, it’s a park not a country.
Yes
Every time he speaks.
Canada... Who would’ve thought?
In my opinion “yes”.
No...he hasn’t done anything against Kenya.
Don’t forget bad hair and cork-tipped smokes.
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
To Mr. Barack Obama
Via: U.S Attorney Russell Dedrick, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern District, Tennessee
From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired
Distribution: Wide
SUBJECT: CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE COMMISSION OF TREASON
I have observed and extensively recorded invidious attacks by military-political aristocrats against the Constitution for twenty years.
Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors—command racketeers—are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America’s constitutional government.
Free from constitutional restraint, and following your criminal example, military commanders deployed U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Alabama last week in a demonstration of their newly received despotic, domestic police power.
We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.
Confident holding your silent agreement and admission, I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy.
My sworn duty Mr. Obama is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.
Obedient to the Constitution in submission of this criminal accusation I remain steadfast, and
Born fighting,
/s/ (notarized)
Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III
United States Naval Academy, Class of 1975
Posted this date via priority, certified mail#: 7008 3230 0003 1463 3346
Hell Yes!
I renounce it. Also that beige is their national color.
Shep Smith would call LCDR Fitzpatrick one of the crazies he receives email from...the kind he read on air and he compared to today’s shooter.
Kudos to Fitzpatrick for NOT ‘standing down’.
“There is no higher authority for a U.S. Naval Commander than the superior office of Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, the President of the Unites States. Yet, LCDR Fitzpatrick has publicly and formally charged President Barack Hussein Obama with the high crime of treason in a federal complaint filed with James R. Dedrick U.S. Attorney, Eastern District Tennessee, and Edgar Schmutzer, Dedrick’s Assistant U.S. Attorney on March 17, 2009.
In doing so, LCDR Fitzpatrick opened himself up to the very serious charge of mutiny, a crime which requires Court Martial and carries the penalty of death.
In the criminal complaint, Fitzpatrick has charged Barack Hussein Obama (and others alleged complicit) with treason, an act that if false, constitutes an act of mutiny on behalf of Commander Fitzpatrick.
However, if Commander Fitzpatrick is right, then the act constitutes the ultimate selfless act of true patriotism, and a glowing example of what it means to stand on an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.
By his actions, Commander Fitzpatrick is either a traitor guilty of mutiny, or a shining example of heroic patriotism, willing to risk all in defense of the U.S. Constitution and the people it was written to protect. The situation could hardly be more serious! If this were a game of high stakes poker, the Commander just went all-in!
From the official complaint— “Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works. - Confident holding your silent agreement and admission, I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy. - My sworn duty, Mr. Obama, is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.”
There’s nothing at all ambiguous about this statement. The basis upon which Commander Fitzpatrick makes his charge is equally straight forward.
- “you [Mr. Obama] have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an imposter president and commander in chief, you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors —command racketeers —are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America’s constitutional government.”
You can read THE OBAMA FEDERAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT in its entirely at Commander Fitzpatrick’s blog site, The JAG Hunter...Dauntless and unafraid! - where you can also find additional follow-up information.
Has Fitzpatrick Lost his Mind?
Fitzpatrick reports that two days after Commander Fitzpatrick filed his charges against the President of the United States, the Secret Service showed up on his doorstep - “Two Secret Service special agents came to my residence two months ago… on 19 March 2009, as directed by James Russell Dedrick, United States Attorney for the Eastern District, Tennessee. Dedrick and his assistant, attorney Edgar Schmutzer, triggered the Secret Service alert and reaction upon receipt of my federal criminal complaint naming Mr. Obama in commission of the crime of TREASON. Dedrick reported me a threat to the imposter Obama.
The two Secret Service agents, escorted by two local police officers, arrived at eight minutes before 3 o’clock in the afternoon. They all left ‘bout an hour later. - I’m still here. - It’s been two months. - Mr. Obama admits his TREASON.”
This may in fact establish some very critical points in what seems to be a storm of monumental consequence brewing on the horizon.
* Questioning Obama’s eligibility constitutes a “threat to national security” in the minds of leftists who clearly don’t care whether or not Obama is a Constitutional President. But what about the rest of us?
* The fact that Fitzpatrick was not immediately taken into custody on the spot is an indication that there is doubt in the minds of Secret Service agents and local law enforcement about Obama’s eligibility.
* The fact that Fitzpatrick has NOT been charged with mutiny is a very strong indication that his charges of treason against Obama, may be very well founded.
* Commander Fitzpatrick takes his oath to the Constitution, more seriously than most.
Commander Fitzpatrick is a career Naval Officer who graduated the Annapolis Naval Academy in 1975 and spent a lifetime serving his country with honor and distinction. He is not known as any form of conspiracy crackpot or extreme right-wing rabble rouser.
As of this writing, he has not been charged with mutiny for his formal charge of treason leveled against the sitting President of the United States, almost three months after those charges were filed, and Secret Service agents effectively vetted those charges on March 19th.
If Fitzpatrick’s charge of treason against the sitting President is false, why has he not been charged with mutiny? Why did Secret Service agents leave without arresting Commander Fitzpatrick on March 19th, or at any time since?
Does Fitzpatrick Stand Alone?
No, he does not stand alone, and Obama knows it. In a telephone interview with Commander Fitzpatrick yesterday, he stated that according to the MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL, he MUST be charged with mutiny if his treason charges against Barack Obama are in any way false. He further explained that he is fully prepared to be charged and accept the potentially severe consequences, if his charges against Obama are not true and accurate.
Fitzpatrick seems the first to take a criminal route to addressing what many Americans believe to be a fraudulent and unconstitutional president and administration. Several others have taken a civil suit approach to forcing Obama out in the open, thus far to no avail.
Over 400,000 American citizens have signed a national petition demanding that Barack Obama keep his campaign promise to operate a “transparent” government, beginning with his own history.
Yet to date, Mr. Obama has spent millions in legal fees to block his true identity from becoming public. His entire past, from birth to adoption in Indonesia, to his travel on an Indonesian passport, his college records, including how such an average individual was able to afford such an expensive Ivy League education, and how he came to be friends with so many evil anti-American individuals during that period, remain a secret guarded far more carefully than actual matters of national security.
Hundreds across the country are now filing Grand Jury Indictments against Obama, via the American Grand Jury initiative, which makes criminal allegations against Obama, very similar to those made by Commander Fitzpatrick.
No, the Commander is by no means alone… although he acted alone in the filing of his formal criminal complaint against his alleged Commander-in-Chief. Is he nuts? I see no signs that he is anything less than a true patriot of impeccable decency, honor and intellect.
Those who oppose his actions will undoubtedly call him every nasty name under the sun. But they will do so without foundation, based upon the research I have done on the man.
What Next?
Like it or not, Mr. Obama was elected on the promise of running a “transparent” administration of high integrity. Yet Mr. Obama has spent millions in legal fees to keep his own identity Top Secret. Why?
No U.S. court has agreed to hear the many civil suits pending against Barack Obama, all of them demanding nothing more than “transparency” in the president. Commander Fitzpatrick’s criminal case has yet to be acted upon by any individual it has been delivered to, all of whom have taken a sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
No mainstream news agency has investigated the growing claims that Barack Obama is a “usurper” and “imposter” engaged in destructive activities against America, and no member of congress has looked beyond Snopes or FactCheck.org to investigate the fact that Mr. Obama has never proven his eligibility for the office he currently holds, nor has he ever been run through the standard security clearance checks used to vet every other individual who has ever been given access to Top Secret information.
How is this even possible?
Commander Fitzpatrick’s complaint ups the ante… It isn’t a civil suit. It’s a federal criminal complaint accusing the sitting president of treason. I can think of nothing more serious…
The Secret Service, the FBI, the CIA, the courts, congress and the press cannot run or hide from Fitzpatrick’s charge of treason. The people don’t need any of these federal bureaucracies currently running interference for Obama, to take action.
The American Grand Jury system places the power right in the people’s hands, and Commander Fitzpatrick’s complaint is a blue print of what the people should file via the Grand Jury system.
Sooner or later, the official answer to the two questions asked in the title of this column will be known by all Americans, Obama supporters and dissenters alike.
The storm is brewing and there is only one way Obama can stop it from hitting land. Obama can come clean at any moment and offer up all of details to his Top Secret life and that will end all of the speculation and every effort underway to force him out in the open. Of course, it will likely end his otherwise promising career too.
The only way Obama can successfully defend himself against Commander Fitzpatrick’s charges is to charge Fitzpatrick with mutiny for filing them. Not doing so constitutes an admission of guilt on Obama’s part. Fitzpatrick intentionally placed Obama in this legal corner… and almost three months later, the Obama camp has still not figured out how to respond to it.
What Can YOU Do?
You can join the American Grand Jury effort and/or individually file your own criminal complaint patterned after Fitzpatrick’s. When this storm reaches critical mass through shear number of similar complaints, there will be nowhere left for Obama to run or hide.
It is important to understand that the charge of treason is unique.
TREASON - This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.
The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Not only is Commander Fitzpatrick risking death for the crime of mutiny himself, he has accused the U.S. President of a crime which is also punishable by death. If Obama is found guilty of treason, every individual who was complicit in the perpetration or perpetuation of that treason is by definition of treason, also guilty. That list is very long… covering his entire administration and maybe beyond.
I can’t remember any time in my life when more was at stake.
In the end, it all comes down to the U.S. Constitution. It either stands as written and ratified, or it is a meaningless piece of paper of no use to any American ever again. This is the Constitutional Crisis so many worried about when Obama chose to seek an office he refused to demonstrate his eligibility for… It should have never been allowed to happen. The reason nobody wants to touch this thing with a ten foot pole is because once done, nobody knows how to undo it! Now we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t…
But it’s here now, and it isn’t going away until the truth is known about Mr. Obama and all of his ill-advised associates. As for the average American, you can choose to become part of the Constitutional solution, or leave the heavy lifting to others.
The Constitution: To be, or not to be..? - The time to choose and act is now!”
I consider my oath to be binding as well. I didn’t take it lightly.
An officer of the United States — in this case a naval officer —is required — REQUIRED — to disobey any order he believes is unlawful. If charged, this officer should DEMAND a general court martial, in which he could depose Obama.
0bam is Kenyan - he should be deported.
Yes
LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (retired)
He cited the deployment of “U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Ala.,” and said, “We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors.
Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government.
The Constitution no longer works.
“I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy,” he wrote.
>I consider my oath to be binding as well. I didn’t take it lightly.
I as well.
Though there are several cases which could be treason, the aid and adherence to America’s enemies, that Obama is directly accountable for:
1 - The full pardoning of the USS Cole bomber.
2 - The dropping of charges of the 11Sep01 terrorists.
3 - The signing into law of a document he did not read (the stimulus bill).
4 - The coercion of the auto execs.
And indirectly:
1 - The dropping of the charges against the two New Black Panther members who were practicing voter-intimidation.
2 - The [specific] closing of auto-dealerships, which MAY be targeted due to their political involvements/
3 - Any ‘bailout’ of California which comes at the expense of ANY other state that he signs.
>Don’t you have to be a citizen to be charged with treason?
>0bam is Kenyan - he should be deported.
Another historic first!
“First President to be deported!”
And that SHOULD be the charge at his IMPEACHMENT trial in the spring of 2011....
Oh, and the USSC could be considered traitors for:
1 - Refusing to see/try the cases against Obama regarding his natural born status.
2 - Refusing to hear the case[s] of the GM/Chrysler bondholders, who are being cheated out of their contractual earnings/assets by sanction of the executive branch.
3 - The 25Jun05 decision (I believe Keely v. New England), wherein they validated governmental theft/larceny under guise of “Immanent Domain”.
Which is exactly why this guy hasn't been charged with anything.
The Congress, generally speaking could be tried for treason for:
1 - The mere suggestion that the AIG bonuses be retroactively taxed at 90%... this is contra-Constitutional in at LEAST four ways.
2 - The refusal to properly investigate Obama’s eligibility before validating the electoral college votes.
3 - The passing of a bill which they, self-admittedly, did not read. (The stimulus package.)
More individually, Murtha:
1 - The condemnation of active-duty Marines in a war-zone before a investigation had even finished.
2 - The judges who ruled that the law protecting federal employees performing their duties applied to him.
3 - Any other such entity who aids and adheres to Murtha.
He was referring to a comment by Evan Thomas (Newsweek?) that Obama is a sort of God.
Rush opined that O did have something in common with God.....God does not have a birth certificate either!
The silence from Obama is deafening
It’s quoted from the CFP article above.
Oop’s Thank you!
BTT
He’s at least guilty of federal document fraud for the forged CoLB he posted on the Internet as his ‘proof of natural born citizenship’. Since he has not proven he’s eligible and has posted a false document with the intent to deceive the American people and defraud the election process, then taken the oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution while violating it knowingly, YES, BARRY SOETORO, aka BArack Obama is guilty of treason. Those giving him cover to remain as head of state under those circumstances are also guilty of treason/treachery against we the people.
Finally the “T” word has been uttered. I wondered how long it would take. Thank you Canada.
Boy those Canadians will go to any length to stop our nationalized health care...they will have no place to go.
I can’t wait for Michael Moore’s movie about our amazing health care.
God Bless this soldier for his courage.
I'm going to post this so that EVERYONE who thinks we are powerless to do something about this understands how best to go about it. We need to find the legal remedy enabling us to charge our representatives with disobeying their oaths of office and start removing them one by one. Here is the case.
Exhibit A, The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 reads as follows:
" ”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
Exhibit B U. S. Code, CITE: 3USC19
TITLE 3--THE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER 1- PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES
Sec. 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act
”(a)(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. “
Exhibit C: U. S. Constitution, Article Six Oath of Office for elected officials:
” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
Exhibit D: The Electoral Vote Counting Act of 1877:
The process currently provides that someone “challenge” the electoral votes during a short, specified time frame while the Electoral College votes are opened and tabulated. This process does not cover challenges to "eligibility" qualifications. In fact, if this act pretends to do so in the manner in which it prescribes, it is unconstitutional. Any act of this sort that does not require that qualifications be presented by the President elect serves to undercut the provisions in the Constitution itself. No act that does not support the Constitution is constitutional. In order to change the requirements of the Twentieth amendment, one would need to pass another amendment. An “Act” doesn’t cut the mustard.
The portion in bold stating “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” in section three is particularly interesting in that it plainly seems to infer that a “qualification” of some sort must be made in order to serve as President. Certainly, one cannot argue that it does not require a qualification process for one to “qualify”. To infer that the lack of a “specified” qualification process means that stated eligibility “qualifications” for the office of president can be ignored is fallacious. The wording of this passage in the twentieth amendment clearly infers that a qualification is required, regardless of how this is done.
There is only one set of qualifications listed anywhere in the Constitution that are not health related and they are listed in Article two, section one.
” No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
To satisfy meeting the requirement of the twentieth amendment to “qualify”, a president elect must present evidence that he meets it’s requirements for eligibility to serve. This means that a proper birth certificate HAD to be presented by the president elect in order to serve as president. If this was done, where is that certificate and to whom was it presented? If this was done, why would we not have the right to verify and inspect it under the freedom of information act?
If it was NOT done, then under the provisions of the twentieth amendment, Barrack Obama has “failed to qualify” and should not be serving as president of the United States of America.
Based upon the above, I conclude that:
1. We currently have a vacancy at President because no one has yet “qualified” as required in the Twentieth amendment. The terms "The President elect shall have failed to qualify" clearly places this burden upon the President elect and not on someone raising their hand in objection.
2. Anyone serving in Congress (see “Congress” in bold in Exhibit A), or anyone who is currently serving under the oath of office in Article six has "standing" and can DEMAND that their oaths be met by receiving proper “qualifying” documentation from Mr. Obama. This charade at the time of counting the Electoral College votes does not limit their ability to do so at any time they so choose. The very fact that they are duty-bound by oath to "support" the Constitution REQUIRES them to respond to any and all attacks against it. No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.
3. We need to start pressing legal charges against all of our local representatives and senators covered by the oath of office in Article six for disobeying their oaths to support the Constitution as it pertains to the language of section three of the Twentieth amendment. Put PRESSURE on them to represent the document that gives them their authority in the first place. We are looking into how best to do this down here. We all should be looking into this approach. NOW.
Oh, do we still enforce laws against treason?
I thought they had gone the way of immigration laws.
Agreed.
Any country that could produce the McKenzie Brothers can't be all bad.
Shityeah
Yes. We need to capture the House in 2010 and impeach this SOB.
Barack Obama is the most successful traitor mole in history. There is nobody in second place. He makes Kim Philby look like a toddler traitor.
>No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.
That second sentence is the theme of a book titled “Constitutional Chaos” by a judge who has the unfortunate luck to share the same last name with the head of the DHS; it is very interesting, however, and worth the read.
Is he guilty of treason ... he is in my book
bump
I don’t think a retired officer can commit mutiny.
No intelligent person, AFAIK, has claimed that Obama is not a citizen. They have claimed he is not a “natural born” citizen and therefore not eligible to be president.
There is no question his mother was an American citizen and therefore so is he.
We are getting close for sure...
I’m just a working class “Pittsburgh Hunky,” but I agree with this guy and I daresay the current occupant of the White House has done a lot of treasonous things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.