[BP2]

If this court case should actually make it as far as the Supreme Court, and if it looks like he is going to lose the case, Obama will make a startling announcement!

Obama announces that the reason why he was withholding his original birth certificate is because he didn't want anyone to know that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, and his father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., WERE NEVER MARRIED!!!!

Bullsh!t -- it's a matter of court record!

And confirmed elsewhere:

The divorce papers would hold up in court -- not a "claim" that there was NOT a marriage. Furthermore, the courts must abide by THIS:

However, if you REALLY want to be sure -- simply conduct a DNA test! I'm sure that would yield some interesting results, too...

[Spunky]

There are two things about that supposed divorce record.

1. There is NO filing No. on it.
2. I can't make out what (written in) date that is. At first glance it appears like says (sold) To many letters to say 2nd, and the year says 1954. I cannot make it out as 1964 even with a magnifying glass.

I can go online and fill out divorce papers but until they are filed with the court they are meaningless.

BPN do you have a copy of one showing a filing No.?

[Polarik]

it's a matter of court record!

BULLSH*T! All I'm looking at are pieces of typed paper with forged signatures on it. What court in this country accepts forged signatures?

What court in this country accepts xeroxed copies of plain, typewritten documents without any evidenciary seals and official signatures ATTESTING TO THE AUTHENTICITY of this document? Both THEN AND NOW!

What court in this country conducts divorce proceedings WITHOUT A MARRIAGE LICENSE?

Plesase give it up, BP2. You're embarrassing yourself.

[El Gato]

Furthermore, the courts must abide by THIS:

Not if the document is a forgery and/or altered.