Posted on 06/27/2009 9:53:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It’s invasive. It’s corrupt. It’s rigged. It’s unconstitutional.
Its purpose is the legislative transformation of the United States of America into a land where conservatives, Christians, and Calcasians will become political castrados.
It is biased and prejudicial.
It serves to channel billions of dollars into bogus political action groups, such as ACORN.
It promotes gay rights and same-sex marriages.
It is a document that was not something drafted by the Berkley chapter of the Barbra Streisand Fan Club or the Alec Baldwin wing of the American Civil Liberties Union.
It is President Barack Obama’s 2010 Census Form.
The form asks if you have a house with running water, if you have a flush toilet, if you go to work by ferryboat or trolleycar, if you are mentally challenged, if you are of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin, and if you are a white, black, negro, African American, American Indian, Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Native Hawaiian, Guamanian or Chamorro, Samoan, Fijian, or Tongan
It asks if you have hot and cold running water, a sink with a faucet, a frigerator, a bathtub or shower, a stove or range, and a flush toilet.
It asks if you use coal, gas, oil, electricity, or solar energy to heat your home or apartment, if you are deaf or blind, if you are mentally challenged, if you have a physical disability, if you are employed, self-employed, or retired, if you have troubled dressing or bathing, if you have difficulty walking or climbing the stairs, and if you speak a language other than English at home.
It asks your income, your educational level, and the time you leave your home in the morning.
But infinitely more telling is what the new census form doesn’t ask.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
IS it really true that if you refuse to answer there is a $5000 fine?
Where in the Constitution is the Federal Government authorized to engage in municipal traffic planning?
Multiply the number in your household by 10. Thar ought to be a statistically valid sample, do't you think?
Hormonal Fortitude?
bookmark
it is for traffic flow planning. How many cars are on the streets approx at the same time. If everyone in your neighborhood leaves at 7 am then bottlenecks occur at specific areas.
Now, they could figure this out with a week of watching the area, but what would be the fun in that?
I didn’t write this article: Paul Williams is the person that used the term “Caucasian”, not I. The rules here say we’re not to change the title or the column.
I’m going to throw it away
Multiply the number in your household by 10. That ought to be a statistically valid sample, don't you think?
He’s describing a “long form” of questions which not one out of a hundred is asked.
And which you can always refuse to answer, as I refused it 9 years ago.
If this is true and anyone gives the census any information, including how many live in your home, you are a fool. BOYCOTT the census and make sure everyone knows the reason why. Let them try to fine 50 million people. It won’t happen! I can’t believe the Republicans sat by and let them take this from the hands of the Dept. Of Commerce. I stay appalled and disgusted by the cowards that turn a blind eye and let these people take over our country. You can rest assured, there will be a race war eventually and it won’t be pretty.
To assist in the hiring of census takers, the Obama Administration has opted to partner with the following special interest groups (not one of which represents the despised race of whites who settled this country):
* ACORN
* 100 Black Men of America
* African American Women’s House of Imagene (sic) Shelter
* American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
* Arab American Institute
* Asian American Federation
* Asian American Justice Center
* Asian and Pacific Islander Coalition on HIV/AIDS
* Association of Professors and Scholars of Iranian Heritage
* Boat People SOS
* Hispanic Alliance for Prosperity Institute
* Hispanic Federation
* Fundacion Azteca
* Latino Justice PDLDEF
* Mas New Mexico
* Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund
* Minority Access
* National Alliance for Hispanic Health
* National Alliance of Black School Educators
* National American Indian Housing Council
* NAACP National Voter Fund
* NAACP (National Association of Colored People)
* National Association for Black Social Workers
* National Association of Colored Women’s Clubs
* National association of Hispanic Federal Executives
* National Association of Hispanic Publications
* National Association of Latino Elected Officials
* National Association of Negro Business and Professional Women’s Clubs
* National Black Chamber of Commerce
* National Black Child Development Institute
* National Black Justice Coalition
* National Black Leadership Forum
* National Coalition on Black Civic Participation
* National Congress of Black Women
* National Federation of Filipino American Associations
* National Hispanic Leadership Institute
* National Hispanic Business Information Clearinghouse
* National Latino Research Center
* National Minority AIDS Council
* National Puerto Rican Coalition
* National Puerto Rican Day Parade
* Rainbow Push Coalition
* U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
* Voto Latino
Get the picture? Notice a racial bias?
These agencies will be paid millions in taxpayers’ dollars to assist the President in conducting the census and to make sure that all minorities are included in the official count.
Not one of the groups represents the despised race of white Europeans who settled this country and gave their sweat and blood to make it the most prosperous nation on earth.
When do we start getting the forms. I am just putting the number of people.
__________
I’m not even putting that now. I will send it back with this article attached and tell them to pound sand. I dare them to fine me. I want to take them to court.
We’ve got to do something. This nonsense has got to stop.
__________
Tell you what. You want to see what is important? Let’s see how many posts and views this thread gets. Then go look at the Michael Jackson thread. Nuff said. Go look at the American Idol thread. The only way to stop this is to catch the Kenyan with a gay lover or something like that. That will be reported on the MSM and people will post 24/7 for a solid week. The National Enquirer will long outlive the Constitution.
That is ALL they Constitutionally NEED.
____________
Then why are they asking and why aren’t we raising holy hell? Since they don’t care about the Constitution, why should I? I’m not telling them ANYthing truthful. 20 people live here now get lost and I am enclosing this article.
My thought exactly. Here’s hoping many households in Oklahoma, Utah, Idaho, Alabama, etc. smarten up and add one or two per household to counteract the illegal fraud happening. Also, no reason not to double count at summer homes as well.
The South will be back solidly Democratic before we hit the quarter century mark.
____________
BS!
First time poster, long time lurker - hello, everyone!
I’m a younger guy and didn’t fill out a census in 2000. I was wondering if that census is online, I would like to see the difference between the one from 2000 one and the one from 2010.
Also - does anyone know if you’re required by law to fill out all census questions? Also - are there usually Not Applicable/Answer Withheld options? I’m assuming no...
The scary thing is, at my day job I use census data quite a bit - we do emergency preparedness and response for civilian populations. All the data I’ve ever seen has never been this detailed and although it’s anonymous when I get it I imagine it’s sitting somewhere out there with names attached.
Thanks for your help. I hope to start contributing more.
I tried posting to this thread earlier and it didn’t show up - if this gets double posted, my apologies. First time posting here - long-time lurker.
I didn’t fill out a census in 2000 (I’m a young’un) and I was wondering if anyone has posted a link comparing the range and types of questions between the 2000 and 2010 census. I fully realize that this upcoming on is quite ridiculous but I’d like to see the extent at which it’s been Obamized (although I’d imagine the 2000 one was partly planned by Clinton so maybe it’s not too far off).
It’s weird - I work with census data for my job and none of the datasets I’ve ever seen have been as detailed as the one being discussed here. The datasets I work with are anonymous, and I’m sure I’ll never see one with names attached to this one, but it’s scary to know that all of this data will be out there, somewhere, with names attached to it.
Of course certain data points (what time do you leave for work) aren’t really provable. Ironically, for the work I do, an estimate of when people leave for work will be beneficial. Too bad it comes at a cost...
Anyway, thanks for the help - I hope to participate more on these boards in the future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.