Mere opinion on a legal issue is unpersuasive unless details and reasoning particular to the law are set out. For the legal reasons already stated, the case for the “border search exception” is compelling.
Compelling is a matter of opinion. As stated in my 2nd post, the USSC has made some incorrect decisions in the past, many for what they viewed as compelling reasons in that particular day and age.
The greater good is served by not forfeiting your 4th amendment rights or allowing them to be trampled upon. Violating the rights of the law abiding to catch criminals is not acceptable to me, even if it means that some criminals who would have been caught are not.