Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Shadow Government of the Obama Administration
The Provocateur ^ | 07/18/2009 | Mike Volpe

Posted on 07/18/2009 7:41:44 PM PDT by fiscon1

I first wrote about the potential dangers of President Obama's penchant for naming czars back in January. Then, President Obama's desire to name czars, envoys, and special advisers was much greater than the actual number. Now, the administration has over thirty czars. They include such dubious functions as green jobs, California water, and pay czars. Most of these czars don't even have functions that any fair reading of the Constitution would give the president. For instance, he has a full assembly line, pardon the pun, of czars just to deal with the auto industry. Of course, the president technically has no jurisdiction over the automobiles. He has a Commerce Secretary to deal with commerce, but to deal with cars he has a whole task force.

(Excerpt) Read more at theeprovocateur.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: czars; domesticpolicy; obama

1 posted on 07/18/2009 7:41:45 PM PDT by fiscon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fiscon1
When you're Il Duce, you have to keep things and people off balance at all times.
2 posted on 07/18/2009 7:46:13 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1
Just call them Commissars: "Commissar is the English transliteration of an official title (Russian: комисса́р) used in Russia after the Bolshevik revolution. The title was mostly associated with a number of Cheka and military functions in many Bolshevik and Soviet government military forces during the Russian Civil War; the White Army widely used the collective term bolsheviks and commissars for their opponents. After that, it was mostly used for People's Commissar (or narkom) for government ministers, and political commissar in the military."
3 posted on 07/18/2009 7:47:56 PM PDT by Palladin (The President wears "mom jeans"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

This guy has the instincts of an Idi Amin.


4 posted on 07/18/2009 7:52:54 PM PDT by Bernard Marx ("Civilizations die by suicide, not from murder" Toynbee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Yes. Anyone who doubts it should watch the movie “The Last King of Scotland.”


5 posted on 07/18/2009 7:54:09 PM PDT by Palladin (The President wears "mom jeans"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

How are they paid? If not authorized by Congress?


6 posted on 07/18/2009 8:02:41 PM PDT by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1
He is setting up his own “uber governmental” force that controls every aspect of our lives with frightening speed.
7 posted on 07/18/2009 8:04:23 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bhoy

good question, I don’t know. I know they have no staff. I don’t think that Immelt, for instance, gets paid at all.


8 posted on 07/18/2009 8:11:40 PM PDT by fiscon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

I ain’t too worried about the czar, it’s the fetters that worry me.


9 posted on 07/18/2009 8:37:34 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

Sooooo....just exactly HOW do We The People pay these czars....who authorizes their GS levels and payroll?


10 posted on 07/18/2009 8:44:19 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

Thanks for info. Wonder if they have offices, expense accounts etc. Something to look into. Also same about previous 1st Drug Czar. Thanks again.


11 posted on 07/18/2009 8:48:44 PM PDT by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bhoy

We need a Congressional Bill to audit all of the czars.


12 posted on 07/18/2009 8:56:40 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Seems Øbama is distracting the citizenry with hurry-up, must-do legislation and bailouts while he takes over industry and banking and constructs his very own...
politburo [(pol-it-byoor-oh, poh-lit-byoor-oh)]

A commonly used name for those who made the major governmental decisions in the former Soviet Union. A politburo, in general, is the chief committee of a communist party.

They are accountable to no one and serve at the "pleasure" of the "President". 32 and counting.

Oh, and since it is evident that Øbama has learned from the very "best" of historical figures, particularly tyrants, I imagine it won't be long before we hear his appointment of kapos as well.

13 posted on 07/18/2009 9:02:46 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Can we or someone sue to have them ruled unconstitutional? I’m not a lawyer, so I have not idea who could bring a challenge, but surely someone can.... and should.


14 posted on 07/18/2009 9:03:06 PM PDT by buschbaby (No longer silent ~ Practice In Your Face Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Il Douche’.


15 posted on 07/18/2009 9:46:15 PM PDT by gigster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buschbaby
Can we or someone sue to have them ruled unconstitutional? I’m not a lawyer, so I have not idea who could bring a challenge, but surely someone can.... and should.

Congress may have standing since any Executive position exercising policy level decisions must be nominated to the Senate for confirmation.

16 posted on 07/19/2009 12:53:33 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: buschbaby

Oh, I forgot to mention I think Obama’s administration has classified these czars as “Presidential advisors” in order to slip them past confirmation requirements.

Advisors however do not exercise any executive power, thus if any of these czars directly exercise any executive powers their decisions and orders may be refused as unconstitutional, although in all likelihood you’ll find yourself fired long before this makes it into a court room.

I guess that means that if one of these czars issues an order anybody affected by that order may have standing to sue the administration over the constitutionality of the order.


17 posted on 07/19/2009 12:57:40 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson