Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: autumnraine

You are incorrect as to what the law was at the time of his birth.

Note that nobody disputes that the father was not a citizen, and nobody disputes that the mother was a citizen, or that she was under 21 years of age.

So if the law was as you state, there would be no question of fact that Obama would not be a citizen, regardless of where he was born.

But in fact, your statement of the law is what applies if Obama was born OUTSIDE the country.

If he was born in Hawaii, and one parent was a citizen, he is a natural born citizen.

That’s why we are having the debate — the question of whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya is the ONLY critical question, as the other facts are not in dispute.


54 posted on 07/29/2009 10:52:58 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

“That’s why we are having the debate — the question of whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya is the ONLY critical question, as the other facts are not in dispute.”

I understand that, that is the whole reason behind the need to see (and not just a website address with a scanned document, but a handed in as official evidence) the birth certificate showing where he was born.

I personally think he was born in Canada to avoid paying the hospital for a birth. The Dunhams lived in Seattle before Hawaii and I’m sure were aware of the ‘free’ healthcare there.


86 posted on 07/29/2009 11:28:19 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson