[curiosity]

When interacting with crackpots, I've noticed a pattern: they can't seem to get their point across in succinct posts. Instead, they cut and past vast amounts of text from their pet websites and stick it in their post.

Why is that, mojito? Why is it you can't argue in your own words, but instead see the need to data-dump a vast tome?

Like most people, I find data-dumping particularly ill-suited to online discussions. Please refrain from in the future.

At any rate, your point boils down the following:

Other than an official long form birth certificate (BC1) all that would have been required is that an adult attest that Obama was born in Hawaii. No questions asked.

Now I read your cut-and-paste job, and yes, I saw this alleged in the text. Yet, there was nothing there to substantiate it other than the word of some anonymous "investigor" who claims to be a retired CIA man. Unfortunately for you, sane people generally do not take the word of anonymous "investigors" very seriously.

[mojito]

I'll be succinct: You can't respond to to the issues raised by the anonymous investigator so you resort to name calling.

Why is that curiosity?

In the future perhaps you can refrain ugly epithets. It's so ill-suited to online discussions. Please refrain from in the future.