[mysterio]

typical bio person, I wouldn’t take your advice for nothing and I hope others see through you as well...

It sounds like you didn't take your grammar teacher's advice, either.

So based on that, which CANNOT BE REFUTED you’d still take the shot, that is why you have no credibility, NONE.

This method of debate reminds me of playing ping pong with someone who hits the ball straight at the ceiling and then claims victory because you didn't return the volley.

Don't get the flu shot if you don't want to. That's your right. However, it's not your right to spread misinformation as fact and put others at risk.

[Scythian]

So you’re saying not to take the vaccine is more risky than taking the vaccine? On what do you base your evidence on? Can you show me the studies that show this vaccine will work on H1N1, reduce fatalities, or even make the flu less severe? What are the long term risks, especially given the rush job being done. I assume you know about the 1976 fiasco where they halted the damage as the vaccine was far, far more risky than not getting vaccinated, I mean, it’s not like folks are totall making this stuff up.

So you’re saying not to take the vaccine is more risky than taking the vaccine? On what do you base your evidence on?

[Scythian]

This vaccination is two shots, that indicates something different dont you think?