Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Scanian

Let’s look at the passage given in the post:

“direct the national response to the cyber threat” - does that mean he can do anything he wants?

“develop detailed cyber...plans” - nothing here about implementing a plan.

“review critical functions” - what functions. Anyway, he’s just reviewing them.

“direct the periodic mapping” - what is “mapping” It’s essential to know this in order to understand the bill.

“direct the national response to the cyber-threat” - does this also mean he can do anything he wants?

“review critical functions” - this is just a review but maybe he must see our private files in order to do the review

The bill needs to say what privacy rights citizens will be left with. It needs to be examined as to its constitutionality.

Seems like the measures proposed in the bill would fall within the purview of the CIA or NSA. Why is it being elevated to the presidential level.


16 posted on 08/30/2009 2:49:38 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frposty

Sure, it gives him the right to do anything he wants. Why else would the libtards want to do this?


17 posted on 08/30/2009 2:58:26 PM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: frposty

I’ll tell you, I trust the CIA, NSA and the ONI a LOT more than OBAMA and his THUGS!

ONI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Naval_Intelligence


19 posted on 08/30/2009 3:12:21 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson