Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Wants Galactic Patent
Mises Economics Blog ^ | 9/2/09 | Stephan Kinsella

Posted on 09/03/2009 9:05:53 PM PDT by Born Conservative

Despite a potentially crippling patent injunction against selling Word that Microsoft is battling on appeal, Microsoft, via a senior lawyer, is nevertheless calling for a global patent system "to make it easier and faster for corporations to enforce their intellectual property rights around the world". Yep--despite the big hit they just took due to i4i's patent, Microsoft is concerned about the "unmanageable backlogs and interminable pendency periods" of national patent systems, which have 3.5 million patents pending. You hear that right--Microsoft things more is "needed to be done to allow corporations to protect their intellectual property." What, do they want i4i to be able to get sextuple, instead of just triple, damages? To jail Microsoft board members?

Microsoft's lawyer repeats the tired old bunk about patents being necessary to promote innovation, yada yada -- "By facing the challenges, realizing a vision, overcoming political barriers, and removing procedural obstacles we can build a global patent system that will promote innovation, enrich public knowledge, encourage competition and drive economic growth and employment."

Two good things about this: (a) a global system would, possibly, reduce the number of patent lawyers; and (b) I was feeling sorry for Microsoft over the Word injunction, but now don't need to anymore.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.mises.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: microsoft; mises; patent

1 posted on 09/03/2009 9:05:53 PM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Microsoft Patents Ones, Zeroes
2 posted on 09/03/2009 9:06:57 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Microsoft’s lawyer repeats the tired old bunk about patents being necessary to promote innovation, yada yada “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;”


3 posted on 09/03/2009 9:42:14 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

yeah before anyone responds...it is up to congress to grant those rights, not some global system


4 posted on 09/03/2009 9:44:10 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Not only are you correct but think of the loss of sovereignty.

The Chinese, etc. would pilfer classified technology and use
an international patent and the international community
to stop our use.

Think of the “who invented it first” suits that would
be brought on. NO!

5 posted on 09/03/2009 10:20:29 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson