Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: larry hagedon

larry: My main problem with “green energy” is that it isn’t all that “green” and is being sold as the safe, clean, and easy alternative to nuclear, coal and petroleum. A point that I make is that if we are going to subsidize something, it should be coal power - - old coal plants are very dirty, new ones are much, much cleaner, we have the coal and nearly all of the necessary infrastructure here already, and by encouraging the building of high-tech coal plants in return for conversion or decommissioning of old ones we make far more and far faster progress in reducing emissions of all kinds.


10 posted on 09/18/2009 4:20:48 PM PDT by jay1949 (Work is the curse of the blogging class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: jay1949

I fully agree with you about coal plants, we need more of them, and now with the new bio technology of using green algae to eat the CO2 emissions, we can get even more energy from them.

British Petroleum Oil Company recently put up 600 million dollars to do green algae research This will pay off big time. All the oil companies are on board, but BP is the leader in investment.

Here is a little secret; two nuclear plants that I know of are expanding production significantly. Cant tell you where they are, for obvious reasons, but it is the real deal.


12 posted on 09/18/2009 5:54:25 PM PDT by larry hagedon (born and raised and retired in Iowa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson